I believe that the first picture shows the moon's, etc. correct position during a neap tide
An ethical dilemma is the practice of "gift-giving" between the parties to a business negotiation is considered right and proper behavior in many asian cultures while some westerners view this as a form of bribery.
Ethics and being ethical are set standards that each person has for themselves as what they view as appropriate in the work place or what they value and believe in. This is often a decision-making problem between moral decisions that neither often are acceptable. Businesses have business ethics and individuals and have ethics that they all believe are true principles to work/life by.
Answer:
differences
Explanation:
a pretest/protest experimental design is that which involve the taking down or recording down of measurements before and after a treatment.pretest-posttest designs are a more suitable experimental design that is usually used when comparing participant groups and also measuring the differences or the degree of change that happens as a result of treatments. there are various forms/ways of analyzing an experimental data of which there is the t-test. t-test is usually used to measure the differences between two groups in an experiment.
comparison of the differences as a form of data analysis of the two variable(husband/wife) in a pretest/protest design using the t-test will show you if its a directional hypothesis or a non directional hypothesis and also clearing shows the relationship when comparing the two variables.
The Supreme Court requires a large amount of domain knowledge that takes years upon years to acquire. By letting a supreme court judge stay indefinitely, it lets the judges become subject matter experts and stay consistent in their rulings, which gives the perception that our highest court is predictable, knowledgeable and fair.
On the other hand, because the supreme court has become very politicized, this means that the party that is in charge when a new justice is appointed gets a disproportionate amount of control over the rule of law for an indefinite period of time.
The fallacies of misdirected and emotional appeals bad arguments becausemisdirected appeals are arguments that “appeals to a questionable authority”. Fallacies of misdirected appeals are bad arguments because the statement is misdirecting the reader by the use of a questionable person of authority in a different subject matter that is not in their field of expertise, thus providing non-supporting evidence for the conclusion
.An emotional appeal is an “argument that appeals to fear”. Fallacies of emotional appeals are bad arguments because they are based on emotions rather than on valid or supporting evidence.
Emotional appeals are used to create a sense of fear into the audience, thus the reactions of the audience are based on their emotions and uncertainties rather than supporting evidence to formulate an educated and unbiased opinion or conclusion
Learn more about argument here:brainly.com/question/3775579
#SPJ4
