It's the practical-ish solution for individuals seeking monetary remedies too low in proportion to attorney fees, and requiring more legally binding enforcement measures than those provided by mediation/arbitration. The ish suffix indicates that it's not the democratized "people's court" that everyone thinks it is... We've found that it's not very useful for low-income, immigrant or shy folks which either don't feel confident enough, or are so ensnared by the legal system that they never think small claims court a viable solution for their problems.
<span>It also plays a great entertainment role, apparently, given the popularity of daytime shows such as that of the assertive Mrs. Judge Judy.</span>
There are different kinds of theory. The doctrine of preemption stipulates that if a state tries to pass a law that conflicts within an area that has federal legislative jurisdiction it will be found unconstitutional.
<h3>What is the doctrine of preemption?</h3>
The doctrine of preemption is known to be a theory that is based on the Supremacy Clause. This state that the federal law will preempts state law, even though there is conflict arising due to the laws.
By the above, a federal court does need a state to stop some behavior it believes does interferes with, or may be in conflict with federal law.
Learn more about doctrine of preemption from
brainly.com/question/10270212
the answer you are looking for is activist.
Answer is B they make-up all matter
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
It can't be A s because they were striving for rights. They definitely didn't want to be powerless again after the tyranny pf the king.
It wouldn't make sense if it were C, because of Shay's Rebellion. They were afraid it would happen again and get more out of control.
it can't be D because it was VERY MUCH discussed. Why else would they write their Federalists Papers?
Your best bet would be B.