1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mazyrski [523]
3 years ago
8

Which of the following is NOT true regarding the production possibilities frontier (PPF)? The PPF illustrates the trade-offs tha

t exist in the production of goods. The PPF illustrates the fundamental ideas of scarcity and opportunity cost. The PPF shows us that gains from trade are maximized when countries produce goods for which they have an absolute advantage in production. The PPF shows the combination of goods that a country can produce given its current productivity and supply of resources.
Business
1 answer:
ddd [48]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The correct answer is: The PPF shows us that gains from trade are maximized when countries produce goods for which they have an absolute advantage in production.

Explanation:

A production possibilities frontier is a curve that shows different combinations or bundles of two goods that can be produced using all the resources and technology available.

It represents the concept of scarcity of resources and opportunity costs. Because of the scarcity of resources we cannot increase the production of both goods. To increase the production of one good we need to sacrifice the production of others. So, there is some opportunity cost involved in producing each additional unit of output.

You might be interested in
Final Review
pashok25 [27]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

if it is not happening to me, then I don't have to worry about it to much.

4 0
4 years ago
Suppose a firm has an annual expenses of $170,000 in wages and salaries, $75,000 in materials, $60,000 in rental expense, and $5
Zolol [24]

Answer:

1. The annual economic costs for the firm described above is:

= $340,000.

2. The economic profit for the firm described above is:

= $80,000.

3. To receive a normal profit the firm described above would have to:

None of the above.

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Wages and salaries expenses = $170,000

Cost of materials = $75,000

Rental expense = $60,000

Interest expense on capital = $5,000

Total expenses = $310,000

Opportunity cost = $30,000

Total costs = $340,000

Revenue per year = $420,000

1. The annual economic costs for the firm described above is:

= $340,000  ($310,000 + $30,000).

2. The economic profit for the firm described above is:

= $80,000 ($420,000 - $340,000).

3. To receive a normal profit the firm described above would have to:

None of the above.

The normal profit = $110,000 ($420,000 - $310,000)

6 0
3 years ago
Molly is a 30% partner in the MAP Partnership. During the current tax year, the partnership reported ordinary income of $200,000
Alexus [3.1K]

Answer:

$62,000

Explanation:

The partnership had a total ordinary income of $200,000. Then guaranteed payments were made to its three partners Molly, Amber and Pat of $20,000 each $20,000 x 3 = $60,000.

$200,000 - 60000

= $140,000

So the partnership adjusted income is reduced to $140,000, out of that amount, 30% belongs to Molly.

30/100 × 140,000

= $42,000

Molly's share of the partnership adjusted income is $42,000.

Molly's total earnings from the partnership are $62,000

= $20,000 + $42,000

= $62,000

6 0
4 years ago
How do fixed costs per unit​ behave?
ipn [44]
83974875687168756574150674564736%
7 0
4 years ago
Beck Inc. and Bryant Inc. have the following operating data:__________.
DiKsa [7]

Answer:

a. Beck Inc. = 5.00  and Bryant Inc. = 2.50

b. Beck Inc. =  $100,000 and 100%  : Bryant Inc. =  $150,000 and 50 %

c. True.

Explanation:

Degree of Operating Leverage shows,  the times Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) would change as a result of a change in Sales contribution.

Degree of Operating Leverage = Contribution ÷ EBIT

Thus,

Beck Inc = $500,000 ÷ $100,000

              = 5.00

Bryant Inc. = $750,000 ÷ $300,000

                 = 2.50

<em>If Sales increased by 20% the effects on Incomes would be :</em>

Beck Inc = 20% × 5.00

              = 100%

              = $100,000 × 100%

              = $100,000

Bryant Inc.=  20% × 2.50

              =  50 %

              =  $300,000 × 50 %

              =  $150,000

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Nemo Haulers is considering whether to purchase a new mini tractor for moving furniture within its warehouse. Nemo calculates th
    6·1 answer
  • According to Statements on Standards for Tax Services, a member of the AICPA in tax practicea. Has the responsibility to be an a
    9·1 answer
  • ____ are entrepreneurs who apply their creativity, vision, and risk taking within a large corporation rather than starting a com
    9·1 answer
  • At her neighbor's garage sale, Constance buys a vanity dressing table from her neighbor, Carlos, for $160. Constance purchased t
    13·1 answer
  • Pease Answer ASAP. I need help with sources to answer the following question:
    15·1 answer
  • On January 1, X9, Gerald received his 50% profits and capital interest in High Air, LLC in exchange for $2,000 in cash and real
    15·2 answers
  • Justine Industries is calculating its Cost of Goods Manufactured at year-end. The company’s accounting records show the followin
    13·1 answer
  • From 1980 to 1989, total consumption of fish in the country of Jurania increased by 4.5 percent, and total consumption of poultr
    10·1 answer
  • Use the following balance sheet and cash flow statement information to answer the questions below. Liquid assets: $10,000; home
    12·1 answer
  • At the beginning of the tax year, Barnaby's basis in the BBB Partnership was $118,800, including his $11,880 share of partnershi
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!