1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IgorC [24]
3 years ago
9

Juror #3 was easily the most vocal proponent of the defendant's guilt. When he

Law
2 answers:
tigry1 [53]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The answer would be The defendant's mother

Explanation:

Hope this helps. Please mark me brainliest

Degger [83]3 years ago
4 0
The defendants mother because he can’t be mad at his son or dad and he can’t be mad at himself the defendants mother would make the most sense
You might be interested in
A PEDESTRIAN CROSSING sign has what color background?
Gelneren [198K]

Answer:

Yellow

Explanation:

The Person is Black and the background is Yellow

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Any know here about priya darshini​
garri49 [273]

Answer:

Nope sorry

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
How are we going to get rid of coronavirus
FinnZ [79.3K]

Answer:

stay inside ovowed people

Explanation:

it ceeps growing because people wont stay awsy from eachothe or stay in side its common sense...

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In california, proposition ______ restricted increases on real estate taxes, making it difficult for localities to raise money.
Fiesta28 [93]

Answer:

The answer is

→ <u><em>13</em></u>

Explanation:

Full sentence:

In California, proposition <u><em>13</em></u> restricted increases on real estate taxes, making it difficult for localities to raise money.

Hope this helped! :^)

8 0
2 years ago
Jack was an employee of ABC Corp. Harry, the president of ABC, had reasonable grounds to believe that Jack had stolen money from
Vaselesa [24]

Answer:

harry will win because he had an absolute privilege to comment on a former employee's performance

Explanation:

If Harry had reasonable reason to suspect that Jack was stealing money from the corporation, it is because Jack gave reason for this distrust and was probably participating in suspicious activities. As such, it is likely that Harry has testimonials (and perhaps evidence) that Jack was actually proving, and Harry has the absolute privilege of commenting on the performance of a former employee, so Harry will probably win the lawsuit.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • As a result of the chestnut blight epidemic___________. 1. all of the others 2. the Plant Quarantine Act was passed 3. the peopl
    9·1 answer
  • In assessing the tort of defamation, the courts must seek a balance between the right to protect one's reputation with the right
    8·1 answer
  • Contributions to PACs are protected by: a. the due process clause. b. the First Amendment. c. various state laws, but not protec
    5·1 answer
  • 19. Which of the following evidence would always be admissible in-court?
    14·1 answer
  • There are three friends: Joaquin, Adam and Jennifer. The three of them witness an accident. When the police questions them, each
    7·2 answers
  • Not having traffic laws enforced and in place would result in
    13·1 answer
  • Why did Plessy argue that the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment had been<br> violated?
    15·1 answer
  • You walk on the path of righteouness God will always remain with you
    5·1 answer
  • Which step of the policy evaluation process would ask you to determine if a policy helps to ensure domestic tranquility?
    6·1 answer
  • Driving a motor vehicle often requires __________ reaction time.
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!