The answer is the first one describing case facts, describing judicial opinion, analyzing law, applying precedent
Answer:eh it depends if the person is making money out of it i would pretty much call it a fraud if the person is making money out of it
Explanation:
Answer:
i think that they have just the right amount of rights depending on what they did if its something really ad as if there sentence is death penalty or life in prison they should have fewer but that's my opinion and i think it has gone positive.
Explanation:
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Given set data base has every new born child's DNA towards every passing of every other. Not meaning habing a crimjnal record puts blood and suliva but preamble DNA from birth, now rather than having to point match on criminal data, rather pre-set DNA data base on every human living or non-living.
Properly deviding DNA base still into split sections for criminal records amd clean records where clean record's are rather added/stamped when found guilty in the court of law, but then having all possible DNA sample at the touch of a button (rather should i say match) pre-liminates playing detective and running around following leads, ensuring closure towards deceased members familiy and aswell as eliminating wrongful imprisonment of non guilty members that adds unnecessary cost and reclurces towrards goverment funds etc.
Having "system that works, why fix" is not as having a system that continuously improves and sustains a flawless lrocedure rather than groping at the mids of a cold case in the hope that somewhere a light switch gets turned or a whistleblower apears is high waist of reacources and complete over kill. Given we are in a modern time where tech constantly improves to ease the human race, why not sustain a even rise in our modern living standards and consecutive growth in a that's even the slightest of possibilities.
