1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ratelena [41]
3 years ago
8

Eastman Kodak reported that the cost of its PPE on December 31, 2010 was $6,805 million. On January 1, 2010, it had been $7,327

million. Also, the balance of accumulated depreciation on December 31, 2010 was $5,254 million. On January 1, 2010, it had been $5,516 million. Depreciation expense for the fiscal year 2010 was $420 million. During 2010, the company bought new equipment with acquisition cost of $254 million worth. The company also sold PPE and reported a $14 million gain on selling PPE.
Questions:

How much did Kodak sell its PPE for (sale price)?
Business
1 answer:
shtirl [24]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Kodak sold its PPE for $108 million

Explanation:

The question here has missing sales figure for a PPE item for which the gain on sale is $14 million (given) .Sale price of PPE item are obtained from a PPE Disposal account.We need to first find the other missing figures of 1. Cost of the Sold PPE and 2. The Accumulated Depreciation of the Sold PPE item. After that we complete our PPE disposal account to find the missing figure of the Sale Price of PPE.

1. Cost of Sold PPE

Open a PPE at Cost Account:  Opening Balance $ 7327 million (Debit), Addition of PPE $ 254 million (Debit),Closing Balance $6805 million(Credit).The Balancing figure of this account $ 776 million (credit) {7327+254-6805} is the cost of the PPE item sold.

2. Accumulated Depreciation of the Sold PPE Item

Open a PPE Accumulated Depreciation Account : Opening Balance $ 5516 million (Credit), Depreciation Expense $ 420 million (Credit), Closing Balance $ 5254 million (Debit). The Balancing figure of this account $682 million (Debit) is the Accumulated Depreciation of the PPE item disposed or sold.

3. Disposal Account and Calculation of the Sale Price (Balancing figure)

Open a PPE Disposal Account : Cost of PPE $ 776 million (Debit), Gain on Sale of PPE $ 14 million (Debit), Accumulated Depreciation of the PPE Sold $ 682 million (Credit). The Balancing figure of this account $ 108 million (Credit) {776+14-108} is the Sale Price of PPE item.

Thus Sale price of the PPE is $ 108 million.

You might be interested in
Three years ago, Kuley invested $32,200. In 2 years from today, he expects to have $50,300. If Kuley expects to earn the same an
lions [1.4K]

Answer:

8.17 years(closest to 8 years )

Explanation:

The future value of $50,300, would be accumulated after 5 years of having made the investment(3 years+2 years=5 years)

As a result, we can determine the annual rate of return based on the future value in year 5 using the future value formula below:

FV=PV*(1+r)^n

FV=future value=$50,300

PV=amount invested initially=$32,200

r=unknown=annual rate of return

n=5 years

$50,300=$32,200*(1+r)^5

$50,300/$32,200=(1+r)^5

$50,300/$32,200 can be rewritten as ($50,300/$32,200)^1

($50,300/$32,200)^1=(1+r)^5

divide index on both sides by 5

($50,300/$32,200)^(1/5)=1+r

r=($50,300/$32,200)^(1/5)-1

r=9.33%

Our next task is to determine how long( in years) it takes to accumulate a future value of $87,200 from today's point, which means we need to determine the value of the investment today( 3 years after making the investment)

FV=$32,200*(1+9.33%)^3

FV=value of investment today=$42,079.82

Lastly, we can ascertain when $42,079.82 today would become $87,200

$87,200=$42,079.82*(1+9.33%)^n

n=number of years=unknown

$87,200/$42,079.82=(1+9.33%)^n

$87,200/$42,079.82=1.0933^n

take log of both sides

ln ($87,200/$42,079.82)=n ln(1.0933)

n=ln ($87,200/$42,079.82)/ln(1.0933)

n=0.72863604/0.08920065

n=8.17 years( from today, approx 8 years)

5 0
3 years ago
In its first month of operation, Ivanhoe Company purchased 320 units of inventory for $5, then 420 units for $6, and finally 360
Dovator [93]

Answer:

Phantom profit = $680

Explanation:

Phantom profits or illusionary profits are used in the context of inventory, during periods of rising costs. It is the difference between profit reported using the historical cost and the profit that would have been reported if the replacement cost was used. To understand this, we need to know the cost of goods sold under both the LIFO and FIFO methods.

Total inventory:

1. 320 units x $5 = $1600

2. 420 units x $6 = $2520

3. 360 units x $7 = $2520

If ending inventory was 400 units, the number of units sold =

Total inventory - ending inventory

(320 + 420 + 360) - 400 = 700 units

FIFO is where by the inventory that first enters the business is the one used first. Common for inventory consisting of perishable goods.

This would be used up as:

1. 320 units x $5 = $1600

2. 380 units x $6 = $2280

Hence, COGS under FIFO = $2280 + $1600 = $3880

LIFO is a method of inventory valuation where the inventory that comes in last is first to be used. This is common in bulk inventory stacked one on top of the other. COGS under this method:

1. 360 units x $7 = $2520

2. 340 units x $6 = $2040

Thus, COGS under LIFO is $2520 + $2040 = $4560

COGS is $4560 when using LIFO and $3880 when using FIFO. Thus, the phantom profit is $4560 - $3880 = $680.

8 0
3 years ago
Frankfort Corporation purchases an investment in Bradley, Inc. at a purchase price of $9.8 million cash, representing 40% (at bo
Schach [20]

Answer:

The correct answer is B

Explanation:

The amount of equity earnings will be computed as:

Amount of earnings = Frankfort share in net Income of Bradley × Bradley Net Income

where

Frankfort share is 40%

Net Income of Bradley amounts to $1,680,000

Putting the values above in the amount of earnings:

= 40% share × $1,680,000

= $672,000

Therefore, the option B is correct.

4 0
4 years ago
What might indicate that you have been a victim of identity theft ?
lesya692 [45]
Numerous things can indicate that you have been a victim to identity theft, a few include: Receiving odd bills, phone calls from your bank, missing or unexpected mail, or errors on your social security statement. Of course there are more but as I said these are just a few. Hope this helps!
3 0
3 years ago
It would be acceptable to have the selling price of a product just above the variable costs and expenses of making and selling i
Gnoma [55]

Answer:

B.both the short run and long run.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • __________ is the only variable which will decrease the amount brought to the market (quantity supplied) if all other variables
    5·1 answer
  • Carey Anderson opened a software consulting firm that immediately paid​ $21,000 for a computer system. Was​ Anderson's computer
    5·1 answer
  • True or false: you always want the lowest possible deductible because it means you will pay less out of pocket in case of a loss
    9·1 answer
  • A business-level strategy is an integrated and coordinated set of commitments and actions the firm uses to gain a competitive ad
    10·1 answer
  • In 2019, Laureen is currently single. She paid $2,800 of qualified tuition and related expenses for each of her twin daughters S
    15·1 answer
  • A company was formed with $60,000 cash contributed by its owners in exchange for common stock. The company borrowed $30,000 from
    13·1 answer
  • Jeremy operates his own small business, but he doesn't want to be bothered with accounting information. He tells his friends, "A
    13·1 answer
  • 1. An economy is initially at full employment, but a decrease in planned investment spending (a component of autonomous expendit
    8·1 answer
  • If Amazon uses a list of all your purchases (books bought, price paid, dates) to recommend other books to you, then it is applyi
    6·1 answer
  • Why should a country trade with other
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!