Answer:
Rationalisation
Explanation:
Rationalisation is the attempt by an individual to justify an action, behaviour, or attitude with logical reasoning. Mostly the reasons given are not appropriate enough.
In the given instance Jake is accused of stealing food products from the store, he justifies his act by claiming that his monthly pay is not sufficient to support his family of five members.
This is not enough reason to still but he still tries to rationalise his action based on his low salary.
EXPLANATION: The MP curve is one of three related curves used in the analysis of the short-run production so basically the marginal product (MP) curve plays in key role in the economic analysis of short-run production by firm
Answer: MP curve looks like a reverse U shaped curve or are invertedly U-shaped
Answer:
Annual maintenance on its equipment = Expensed
Remodelling of offices = Capitalised and depreciated.
Rearrangement of the shipping and receiving area = Capitalised and depreciated.
Addition of a security system = Capitalised and depreciated.
Explanation:
Annual maintenance on its equipment = $5,400 ( This is a normal maintenance bill and can be entirely expensed in the year it occurs.)
Remodelling of offices = $22,000 ( This is a part of the transformation process and should be capitalised and depreciated accordingly.)
Rearrangement of the shipping and receiving area = $35,000 (Since this is a reorganisation that would increase efficiency, it should be capitalised and depreciated.)
Addition of a security system = $25,000 ( Since this is an addition of asset, it should be capitalised and depreciated.)
It would be salary because its the same pay rate no matter if you work extra hrs or not
Answer:
A. Meta-conflict
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario Jon and Ana's exchange is an example of a meta-conflict. This term refers to a disagreement or conflict about how exactly one should engage in a conflict. Which in this scenario both Ana and Jon are arguing that the other is approaching the conflict in the incorrect manner.
