Proximate cause represents the proposition that a negligent party is legally liable only for the foreseeable risk that they cause.
A proximate cause, as used in both law and insurance, is an event that is sufficiently connected to an injury for the courts to recognize it as the injury's primary cause. The legal system distinguishes between proximate (also known as legal) cause and cause-in-fact. The "but for" test is used to identify cause-in-fact: Without the action, the outcome would not have occurred. (For instance, if the driver had not run the red light, the collision would not have happened.) Although the action is a necessary precondition for the injury, it might not be sufficient in and of itself. There are a few situations where the but for test is useless.
Learn more about Proximate cause, here
brainly.com/question/13885854
#SPJ4
Answer: Civil rights act of 1964
Explanation:
It prohibits anything about race therefore outlaws that.
The Constitution is made flexible by the elastic clause because it gives government the right to extend its power and meet new situations.
I would say possible. That is the best answer.
Answer: An act of piracy must meet very specific criteria to be considered an act of piracy according to the International Maritime Bureau.
Explanation: Among those criteria are: The pirates must board another vessel; The pirates must intend to steal or commit another crime.
This is not Plagiarized and can be directly copied and pasted to whatever assignment your working on.
