Yes, it is plagiarism.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Plagiarism means stealing or copying others work and showing it as one’s own work. It is also known as commitment of literary theft. Changing or editing someone’s work without mentioning them or giving credit to them.
Plagiarism can be avoided by mentioning the source where the content is copied or borrowed. The required information can be given to the followers regarding the content source.
Each information and content is protected by <u>copyright laws</u>. So misusing the content without the knowledge of the source person can lead to serious problem.
Some Native American tribes thought by making a partnership with the settlers that they would be able to trade goods with the settlers and bring peace among the colonists and themselves. A short time of peace was brought among them, before fighting broke out.
Answer:
the limitation of his investigation is amount of involvement that he can have.
Explanation:
By choosing a descriptive investigation method, the student is limited to creating a highly detailed description of the bacteria but cannot investigate and answer the more important questions such as how to grow the bacteria. An experimental investigation would allow the student to test different methods of growing the bacteria and compare them to see which one is actually the most effective. Thus the limitation of his investigation is amount of involvement that he can have.
<u>Answer:</u>
The offender would stand a good chance of being caught or punished.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The theory of rational action was also called the theory of rational choice can explain the reason, which assumes that an individual has preferences among the options available that allow them to state which choice they make. It is presumed that these preferences are done (the individual can always say which of two options they find acceptable or that none is preferred to the other) and transitive (If option A is preferred to option B and option B is preferred to option C, instead option A is preferred to option C).
Here the circumstances of being caught or punished would be preferred by prompt and offender to decide forgo the crime as they have assumed to take into account available information, event chances, cost of potential and advantages in finding out the preferences, and to behave consistently in selecting the best choice of action self-determined.