Answer:
The correct answer is option D.
Explanation:
A monopoly firm is neither productively nor allocative efficient. The reason behind this is that it does not utilize the resources efficiently and produces below the socially optimal level of output.
Unlike perfect competition, which produces at the point where price equals marginal cost, a monopolist produces at the point where the price is greater than marginal cost.
This inefficiency is visible through the decrease in consumer surplus and deadweight loss. The difference between socially optimal level of output and monopoly output also represents inefficiency. The value of the goods and services that could have been made if monopolist chose to produce at a socially optimal level also shows inefficiency.
With face value equal to $ 1000, present value equal to $ 1,065, we get nper = 16.5 * 2 = 33. Rate(ytm) is equal to 7.7%/2 = 3.85%.PMT (coupon payment) = $ 42.01.Coupon rate = (42.01 / 1000) = 4.20%.Therefore, the annual coupon rate is equal to 4.2 * 2 which equates to 8.40%
Answer:
<u> selling price at year 3:</u> $ 188.89
<u>at constant dollar year 3:</u> $ 167.94
Explanation:
selling price x accumualte raises:
selling price: 188,892
now, to calculate the constante dollar we discount for inflation:
constant dollar selling price: 167,9398271
Answer:
10% foreign exchange loss on the U.S. dollar accounts receivable
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this example the Canadian subsidiary will record a 10% foreign exchange loss on the U.S. dollar accounts receivable. That is because as the Canadian dollar has appreciated 10% against the U.S. dollar, it means that it has lost 10% of it's buying power due to its foreign exchange price change, thus resulting in a loss which needs to be recorded.
