Based on the amount of equity and that of assets, the percentage funded by owners is<u> 29.4%. </u>
<h3>What is the Percentage financed by owners?</h3>
This can be found by the formula:
= Equity / Assets x 100%
Solving gives:
= 6,702,500 / 22,825,084 x 100%
= 29.4%
In conclusion, 29.4% is financed by the owners.
Find out more on Equity at brainly.com/question/25847981.
Answer:
Options 1 - 4 are True but 5 is FALSE
Explanation:
All options given are indicators of economic growth and strong economic performance
When considering the economic prospects of a country, it can be said that: 1. the advantages of building brand loyalty and gaining experience in a country's business practices is greater for a last-mover than for a first-mover <em>because the last-mover has the chance to learn from the mistakes of the first-mover and perfect on them</em>
2. countries which do not have property rights protection tend to achieve greater economic growth rates because<em> </em><em><u>prosperity and property rights are inextricably linked</u></em><em>. The importance of having well-defined and strongly protected property rights is now widely recognized among economists and policymakers</em>
3. the economic system and property rights regime are reasonably good predictors of economic prospects of a country because <em>widely accepted explanation is that </em><u><em>well-enforced property rights provide incentives for individuals to participate in economic activities, such as investment</em></u><em>, innovation and trade, which lead to a more efficient market.</em>
4. countries where property rights are not well respected and where corruption is rampant always have very low levels of economic growth because as stated in 3 above <u><em>ill-enforced property rights does not provide incentives for individuals to participate in economic activities, such as investment</em></u><em>, innovation and trade, which lead to a more efficient market.</em>
5.countries with command economies tend to achieve greater economic growth rates than free market economies.
<em>This is FALSE because one of the Command economy disadvantages include lack of competition and lack of efficiency.
</em>
<em />
The answer is "trade deficit would widen in that country".
A fixed exchange rate regime forces financial discipline on
nations and abridges price inflation. For instance, if a nation expands its
cash supply by printing more money, the expansion in cash supply would prompt price
inflation. Given fixed exchange rates, inflation would make the nation's
merchandise noncompetitive in world markets, while the costs of imports would
turn out to be more appealing in that nation. The outcome would be an
augmenting exchange shortage in the nation, with the nation bringing in more
than it sends out.
Answer:
Hornberger plows back 22.72% of its earnings into the firm.
Explanation:
Plowback ratio fundamental analysis ratio that measures how much earnings are retained after dividends are paid out.
We can use the relationship g = ROE × b to find the plowback ratio (b).
The growth rate implied by the recent dividend and the expected dividend is estimated using the equation, D1 = D0 × (1 + g)
$2.05 = $2.00 × (1 + g)
$2.05 - 2.00 = 2.00g
0.05 / 2 = g
g = 2.5%
Then according to the equation (b)
2.50% = 11.00% × b
b = 2.50%/11.00%
b = 22.72%
Answer:
B. buyers bear most of the incidence of the tax.
Explanation:
If demand is inelastic, quantity demanded is insensitive to changes in price.
If supply is elastic, a small change in price has a great effect on quantity supplied. Quantity supplied is sensitive to changes in price.
If a tax is imposed on gasoline, the incidence (who pays for the tax) can be beqred by the consumers because they have an inelastic demand. If the price of gasoline rises , the quantity demanded doesn't change.
If the tax incidence was borne by the suppliers, the quantity supplied would drop.
I hope my answer helps you.
