Answer:
B is the correct answer
Explanation:
All of the words show that the article is trying to point out contradictory reasoning in whatever its talking about.
Answer:
carbon dioxide
carbon in the Earth's atmosphere exists in two main forms: carbon dioxide and methane.
Considering how large of a GDP the US have, I would agree with such a move. There's several reasons why I would agree on such a move. One of them is of course the well being of the nature, as it is crucial for the survival of every living organism, including the humans. Reforestation will bring in lot of benefits that will gradually return the investment. For starters, the air quality will improve, and by doing so, the health problems among the people will reduce significantly, thus much less will be spent on healthcare. Part of the new forests can be fruit forests, which will be an enormous reserve of organic food without having to use any labor or effort in production. Also, by establishing forests, whole ecosystems will get back on the scene, so lot of useful plants can be harvested from the forests, such as herbs and mushrooms. If the US makes a deal so that it can use certain part of the benefits from the forests until it gets its enormous investment, it will be a win-win situation for everyone. In order to have the budget for the global reforestation, it would be the best to cut down on the budget for development of weapon of mass destruction and the budget for war.
Answer:
C. It is larger in urban areas
Explanation:
- Carrying capacity is the number or the amount of pressure of species on the earth's ecological system can bear or can carryforwards and can be sustained by giving food, water, and necessity available to the environment.
- The ecological footprint is a measure or a way to estimate the pressure on the natural resources by these species by taking in the future possibilities and limitations. Estimated in terms of the demands and the biocapacity of the ecosystem.
- <u>The urban area carrying capacity is a result of interaction of the multiple subsystems and due to the large human activities the urban areas have low levels of the carrying capacity as they are not natural settings and put pressure and huge load over resources.</u>
It’s would be B( the 2nd one).
