Answer:
Economist A
Explanation:
Elasticity is a measure of investment sensitivity. If the investment is elastic, a slight increase in price (interest rate) will decrease the amount of investment. Conversely, if the investment is inelastic, a change in interest rates will not considerably affect the investment rate. The calculation of elasticity consists of the change in the investment rate divided by the change in the interest rate. If the calculation of elasticity is less than 1, it is considered ineastic, while investments with elasticity above 1 are considered elastic. Thus, economist A believes that the investment rate is elastic to the interest rate, while economist B believes the opposite. So for economist A the rise in interest rates will affect the investment rate of the economy (and hence the macroeconomic environment) because in his view investment is elastic. Economist B does not believe that interest rate fluctuations will affect demand for investments.
Answer:
Calvin would have a long-term capital gain of $1000.
Explanation:
Calvin's contributions towards partnership is as below
Beg $43,000
2010 income $22,000
2011 income $25,000
2010 income $12,000
Total contribution $102,000
Total amount Calvin realized by selling his partnership interest = $103,000.
Therefore, Calvin would have a long-term capital gain of $1000 (amount Calvin realized - Calvin's contributions = $103,000 - $102,000).
Developing new menu offerings has been one of the commonly used marketing strategies by restaurants to address changes in competition to other competing restaurants. They advertise their menu by creating banners and using social media to inform the customers on their new menus.
Accumulated Balance is given by :

Here,
n = time period = 30×12 = 360.

P = principal price = $250.
Putting all given values in above equation, we get :

Hence, this is the required solution.
This is an example of a non-disparagement agreement.
<h3><u>What is a non-disparagement agreement?</u></h3>
A part of an agreement, such as an employment contract, separation agreement, or marital settlement agreement, stipulates that the involved parties are prohibited from making any negative statements, remarks, or representations about each other. Such clauses are in prevalent use to prevent (ex) employees from adversely affecting the business of employers with disparaging public statements either during or after the employment period has ended.
<h3><u>What Takes Place If a Non-Disparagement Clause Is Broken?</u></h3>
A non-disparagement agreement is still a contract with potential legal repercussions if you don't uphold your half of the bargain, just like any other legal instrument. A breach of a non-disparagement agreement typically has financial repercussions. You might be required to repay all or a portion of your severance pay if non-disparagement was a requirement for you to receive it, depending on the terms of the agreement.
Learn more about the non-disparagement agreement with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/14592097?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4