<span>I'm looking for a salary that can sustain my living situation. I don't want to drain your company of wealth or anything like that, but I don't want to be underpaid. You can look at all of my qualifications and we can agree on a salary that will be fair for both me and the company. For example, I think that a $100,000 a year salary is not one that is fair for the company, but I would not be opposed to it! $40,000 a year is probably fair for the company, but not for me. Somewhere in between those two values is a fair salary for me.</span>
"Choose to do nothing about the issue" is the one among the following choices given in the question that <span>is one course of action available in every decision making process. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or option "c". I hope the answer has come to your help.</span>
Answer:
In my opinion Jack believes in the efficiency wage theory. This theory states that an increase in wages will increase labor productivity, lower staff turnover and attract the best possible employees.
So when Jack increases his employees' salaries, their increased productivity will recoup the extra labor costs. At the end, Jack believes his profit will increase because of the higher wages he pays.
Answer:
3.20
Explanation:
The computation of the asset turnover ratio is shown below:
Total asset turnover = (Net Sales revenue ÷ Average Total assets)
= ($16,320,000 ÷ $5,100,000)
= 3.20
It shows a ratio between the net sales revenue and the average total assets.
All other information which is given is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
Answer:
Contribution margin= $169
Explanation:
<u>First, we need to calculate the total unitary variable cost:</u>
total unitary variable cost= direct material + direct labor + variable overhead + variable selling expense
total unitary variable cost= 38 + 1 + 8 + 4
total unitary variable cost= $51
<u>Now, the contribution margin:</u>
Contribution margin= 220 - 51
Contribution margin= $169
