A. Practice giving the speech
Answer:
D). The authors effectively use verifiable data and a quotation from an expert to support their claim.
Explanation:
The authors are required to provide sufficient evidences while including a claim or argument in a literary work not only to substantiate the claim but also to enhance its credibility and objectivity.
As per the question, option D displays the statement that best assesses the evidence in the text as <u>it reflects that the authors efficiently employ data that are verifiable which leads to validate their claim objectively and the use of a quotation from an expert functions to back(support) their claim and establish the reliability and significance of their point/claim among the readers.</u> Therefore, such evidences would promote a strong and effective conclusion. Therefore, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
If it is a right triangle, it would be 32 for the legnth.
A. "When she ... lived there."
This line only defines a specific detail about how the special agent survived through a fake name as a spy. No central theme is described through this sentence.
B. "Baissac’s goal ... resistance groups."
This statement provides the agent’s motive and the way she enacted the task provided. However, that does not completely cover everything in the passage.
C. "Baissac did ... her tasks."
Significant work is not specific, and Normandy and traveling by a bicycle are smaller and irrelevant details, not the big picture that should be concluded from this passage.
D. "As a ... German troops."
This is the statement that definitely defines the central idea of the excerpt. When we break this line into sections, we can see that it illustrates that she performed multiple essential tasks when appointed in Normandy. The phrase “sometimes dangerous tasks” describes the critical nature of the job she handled in there. And, also the opposition (German troops) is clearly mentioned in this sentence which helps to convey the idea very clearly.
The paragraph is main idea detail detail
