A rebuttal is a sort of countering something. For an author to cause his reply to become more grounded, he should point a rundown of defects on the given contention to balance it.
<h3>How can the writer revise the rebuttal to make it stronger? </h3>
Correct answer is option A.
- By rephrasing it as a conclusion.
- This will make it harder for the person who gave the assertion difficult to safeguard the case the individual in question is attempting to shield.
- The counterclaim has one significant component that the rejoinder doesn't, which is a solid and obvious source that upholds their position. In this way, the compose can make their reply more grounded by adding a measurement or citation.
Therefore, correct answer is option A.
For more information about rebuttal, refer the following link:
brainly.com/question/3959097
2 & 4 i believe. metacognition is where the reader is aware and understanding of their own thought process so.
Answer:
i think its answer is true
The first two are parallel: "Bernie not only forgot <u>his one-year anniversary with Rachel</u> but also <u>he missed his father's birthday</u>." His and the name of a person, as well as their special day, are mentioned in each of the underlined phrases. Although they do not sound the same and may not have the same number of words, the construction of meaning is the same and the number of syllables is roughly the same. In, "Stan is a <u>voracious reader</u>, an <u>expressive writer</u>, and a <u>skillful painter</u>." all the underlined things are exactly two words, a strong adjective, followed by a -er hobby/occupational word. This would be more so the organization of ideas, because each clause has a slightly different meaning due to the different connotations of the adjectives used.
Hope that clears it up for you so that you can do it yourself next time!
The second poem is correct edge 2020
