Answer:
- When making an analysis and map of another person’s argument, you should correct obvious mistakes.
- In analyzing and mapping the statements in an argument, context is not important.
Explanation:
The argument map is made to present a visual representation of the structure of an argument, showing all the premises, objections, counter-arguments, themes and statements that led to the construction of the given argument. This type of representation is used to support the reasoning and critical thinking of whoever is analyzing the argument.
In this case, whoever analyzes the arch for the construction of maps, must not correct errors, even small and perceptible errors, but must build the map the way the argument was built, even with its mistakes and successes. The context of the argument is very important at this point, since without the context, it is impossible to determine the reasoning and thinking that composed the argument.
Answer:
How were laws made in Virginia and New England? The House of Burgesses helped make laws in Virginia. In New England, colonists at town meetings decided local issues. Did colonists benefit from the English Bill of Rights?
Explanation:
Middle Passage, the forced voyage of enslaved Africans across the Atlantic Ocean to the New World.
Answer:
This description of the narrator's feelings about the darkness helps create a claustrophobic mood and a sense of the narrator's fear and discomfort because of the dark: it's intensity, it's force, has an impact on the narrator. Therefore, this creates an atmosphere and a setting of suspense.
Explores found their way to North
