Answer:
The answer is that the reader would be analyzing the <u>diction</u> of a novel.
Explanation:
Diction refers to the linguistic choices a writer makes to effectively convey an idea, a point of view, or tell a story. The utilization of diction is the careful selection of words to communicate a message or establish a particular voice or writing style. For example, flowy, figurative language creates colorful prose, while a more formal vocabulary with concise and direct language can help a main point to come across as clear and precise.
Writers use diction in order to choose specific words and phrases depending on the outcome they’re trying to achieve. Diction can:
- Create a certain tone that supports purpose. The purpose of a piece of writing determines its diction. In literature and fiction writing, writers often use informal diction and figures of speech—words used for non-literal meanings, like similes and metaphors. If a scientist is publishing a paper on their research, however, the language will be technical, concise, and formal, written for a specific audience.
- Support the setting. In fiction writing, the language an author uses supports the basic story elements, like setting. Diction helps establish when and where a story is set by using language native to that time and place, which is called colloquial diction. For example, a story set in New York City will have a different style of language compared to a story that takes place in London.
- Establish a narrative voice and tone. A writer’s attitude towards the subject of a story comes through in the words used throughout the story. This helps establish tone and impacts a reader's emotional response. For instance, the tone of a horror novel will be very different to that of a romance novel.
- Bring characters to life. A writer can tell a reader a lot about characters through their dialogue. The way a character uses diction reflects personal details like age and gender, background, social setting, and profession.
Answer: there are many reasons
Explanation:
"Sagacity" refers to the ability of a person to make sound judgement. It is similar to wisdom. In this case, it refers to the self-reliance of Yorkshire men.
"To bestow" is to present something as a gift. It is often used as a synonym of "to confer" (an honor, an award). The word here refers to reluctance of Yorkshire men to offer assistance to others.
This info came from down below, also sorry this is years late.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/11284558#readmore
For the aphorisms, Franklin’s technique that is used are: A) Rhyme is used. B) Rhyme is used.
<h3>What is aphorism?</h3>
Concise, terse, laconic, or memorable expression of a general truth or principle is called aphorism.
A rhyme is repetition of sounds between two words and it is usually the sounds after the final stressed syllable of each word.
2. Aphorisms use metaphors, creative imagery and other literary terms to express ideas. Since they are universal truths about life, they help persuade readers to accept the message.
Aphorisms are used in motivational speeches for increased understanding of the audience.
3. Aphorism for contemporary life: "He who hesitates is lost".
To know more about aphorism, refer
brainly.com/question/1639029
#SPJ4
Answer:
The central idea of the text is that there are situations in which winning is the most important thing, as well as how this victory was achieved.
Explanation:
"The importance of Winning" is a text that highlights how the sense of winning and losing is relative and variable in several different situations. In this text, we can see that the author states that we are taught, since we were children, that winning is not the most important situation in our lives, what matters is that we participate and have fun in a situation. This can be true in school competitions, or playing with our friends. However, there are situations in which winning is very important and the way you win is essential. An example of this, can be seen in politics and for that, the text addresses the presidential election of France where one of the candidates was an ultra nationalist who wanted to expel all immigrants from France, while the other candidate was a conservative politician more tolerant of immigration and cooperation with other countries. This was a case in which winning was of extreme importance for both candidates and migrants.
