The Mongols treated the non-muslim subjects most fairly, while the Ottomans treated them the least fairly.
The Mongols were religiously tolerant because they conquered and rule through manpower rather than religion. The Ottomans were the least fair to non-muslims. It is close between the Umayyads and the Ottomans, but the only difference is the amount of discrimination (per se) held against non-muslims. While the Umayyads only had the jizya (tax paid if you were non-muslim), the Ottomans had distinctive restrictions on non-muslims. They had dress codes according to their religion and could only reside in neighborhoods who's residents were of the same religion (under the Ottomans).
Answer:
Your answer would be A
Explanation:
Women and disabled men would be the ones to opposed of this idea. because if you have disabled men drafted to the military your gonna have some conformation
If this helped please mark me brainliest
John Locke<span> believed that the </span>government<span> existed in order to help protect people and to help society function, while </span>Thomas Hobbes<span> believed that people needed the </span>government<span> to tell them what to do, or otherwise, there would be nothing but fighting among people.
to protect people and to keep things civilized.
</span>
