1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natta225 [31]
3 years ago
12

The Concordat of Worms:

History
1 answer:
pickupchik [31]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

<u>Option-(c): Is the best option to choose from the given five options.</u>

Explanation:

<u>The Concordat of Worms:</u>

It was an agreement between the Henry IV and the  pope. It was due to the conflicts between the two, as there was a conflict between them over the Church. As they had tensions over the power of church. And they eventually got to a point where they resolved the whole problem.

As they stipulated that lay rulers could no longer invest prelates with the symbols of their office.

You might be interested in
How does senator Smith respond to the articles written about him?
KIM [24]
I haven’t learned that yet sry
4 0
3 years ago
Who helped the colonists in the French and Indian War?
Nastasia [14]
The British and France went to war the Indians helped out.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which best describes the Bush Doctrine of Preemption? A. a foreign policy stance that ascribes to multilateral engagement for th
dalvyx [7]

D. a foreign policy stance that espouses a unilateral approach to protecting the best interests of the United States.

This sort of policy agenda was part of the "neoconservative" view of a number of  President George W. Bush's advisers -- especially some who had also served in the administration of his father, President George H.W. Bush.  In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, there was a desire to push American values and not be shy about doing so with the use of American military might.  Sometimes referred to as the "Bush Doctrine," the core ideas were that the United States could pursue this goals on its own (without need for United Nations partnerships), that preemptive strikes were allowable against countries that harbored terrorists, and that regime change for the sake of promoting democracy was a good strategy.  

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In Schenck v. United States, what circumstance made this speech case special? It pertained to a foreign citizen. It involved eve
Igoryamba

Answer:

It occured during wartime

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Based on this document, why did many white Americans support the Chinese Exclusion Act?
sergejj [24]
Because there were too many Chinese come to america for build railroad and want to be american citizen
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When Machiavelli wrote The Prince in 1513, he faced a lot of criticism. What were the key ideas of the book called The Prince, a
    7·1 answer
  • The two decades after World War II saw 1 Point A. a reduction in atomic weapons. B. little change to national borders. C. severa
    12·1 answer
  • Match these items with the descriptions.
    9·1 answer
  • There were tremendous changes for African American civil rights during the 1950s and 1960s. In your opinion, what was the most i
    10·1 answer
  • What did Jefferson do during his Presidency in 1800?
    7·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes Reagan’s political style?
    7·1 answer
  • Because of pollution, high crime rates, and unhealthy conditions in some boomtowns, -
    6·2 answers
  • Which statement about Teddy Roosevelt's progressive measures is false?
    11·2 answers
  • How did bleeding Kansas cause tension between the North and the South?
    11·1 answer
  • De acuerdo a las caracteristcas geograficas y climaticas de la region donde usted vive: ¿como cree que los pueblos originarios e
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!