The correct answer is A) France received reparations for loss of property.
The French did not receive these reparations from Haiti until the 1830's. After Haiti gained its independence from France, France lost a significant amount of money. This is because Haiti made the French government millions of dollars in today's currency thanks to the production of sugar.
This conflict between Haiti and France was not solved until 1838, when Haiti agreed to pay France reparations for the loss of their citizens property. In return, France recognized Haiti as an independent and sovereign nation.
Monarchy can be any gender but a patriarchy is where only men rule the kingdom.
Yes. The United States declined to give aid to Hungarian patriots in 1849, and this was called isolationism. Isolationism is a policy that tries to refrain from any involvement with global affairs.
In response to Fascist aggression in the 1930s, Great Britain and France followed a policy of <span>Appeasement.</span>
Answer:
Federalist Papers to help people to understand the US Constitution.
Explanation:
There are 85 essays in Federalist Papers which were printed in New York newspapers while New York State was deciding whether or not to support the U.S. Constitution. These are a series of eighty-five letters written to newspapers in 1787-1788 by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, urging ratification of the Constitution Other newspapers outside New York also published the essays as other states were deciding to ratify the Constitution. In 1788, the papers were published together in a book called The Federalist. As of today, the people still read the Federalist Papers to help them understand the Constitution.
Hamilton, who wrote about two-thirds of the essays has addressed the objections of opponents, who feared a tyrannical central government that would supersede states’ rights and encroach on individual liberties. All strong nationalists, the essayists argued that, most important, the proposed system would preserve the Union, now in danger of breaking apart, and empower the federal government to act firmly and coherently in the national interest. Conflicting economic and political interests would be reconciled through a representative Congress, whose legislation would be subject to presidential veto and judicial review.
