He disagree with the revolutions plans, not so much the revolution itself.
Because, he argued not the substitution as such but its programs: the French revolution needed to abolish the past of France and found a new, complex system, they make it work in actuality (and Burke said that it would not work). On the other hand, the American rebellion did not murder the British legacy: the different individual rights, the common law etc. For him, the uprising was supported by the very laws of British law.
<span>The Immigration Act was the law passed by congress in 1924 that lowered the number of allowed immigrants from European nations to 2% of the number who lived in the U.S. as reported in the 1890 census.</span>
