Answer:
MPC = 0.4
Explanation:
Multiplier shows change in income due to change (increase) in investment, or change (decrease) in tax. It is calculated by Marginal Propensity to Consume, as follows -
Multiplier ie k = Δ Income / Δ (govt investment or tax) = 1 / (1 - MPC)
Given : ΔG ie tax fall = 60 ; Targeted income rise = Full employment - actual output = 2000 - 1900 = 100
k = ΔY / ΔG = 100 / 60 = 1.67
k = 1 / (1 - MPC) → 1 - MPC = 1 / k → 1 - MPC = 1 / 1.67 → 1 - MPC = 0.6
MPC = 1 - 0.6 → MPC = 0.4
Answer
I would stop playing and leave with the $10000 free of tax
Explanation
The truth in such games is that they are not designed to be exactly 50/50. There are possibilities for outcomes that will tie or loose. Furthermore, a game that is really 50/50, the house will deduct some commission. These games always have a room for the house advantage, thus for me, I will just go with $10000 fortune!
Answer:
9.87%
Explanation:
Calculation to determine What APR do you have to earn in order to achieve your goal
$2.7 million = $600{[(1 + r)444 − 1] / r}
r = .0082*100
r=.82%
r = .82% × 12
r = 9.87%
Therefore the APR you have to earn in order to achieve your goal is 9.87%
Answer:
The answer is: A) some people win, some people lose, and there is a loss of economic efficiency.
Explanation:
When the government imposes a price ceiling, some consumers win since they buy cheaper products (lower than equilibrium price) but suppliers lose. Inf the government decides a price floor is better, then customers will lose and some suppliers will win (prices are higher than equilibrium price).
Both price ceilings and price floors cause deadweight loss, decreasing economic efficiency.
