Answer:
B. the force of friction of the road on the tires
Explanation:
Unless the car engine is like jet engine, the main force that accelerates the car forward is the force of friction of the road on the tires, which is ultimately driven by the force of engine on the tires shaft. As the engine, and the shaft are part of the system, their interaction is internal. According to Newton laws of motion, the acceleration needs external force, in this case it's the friction of the road on the tires.
Answer:
<u>Searching in google I found the total mass and the radius of the ball (m = 1.5 kg and r = 10 cm) which are needed to solve the problem!</u>
The ball rotates 6.78 revolutions.
Explanation:
<u>Searching in google I found the total mass and the radius of the ball (m = 1.5 kg and r = 10 cm) which are needed to solve the problem!</u>
At the bottom the ball has the following angular speed:

Now, we need to find the distance traveled by the ball (L) by using θ=28° and h(height) = 2 m:
To find the revolutions we need the time, which can be found using the following equation:
(1)
So first, we need to find the acceleration:
(2)
By entering equation (2) into (1) we have:

Since it starts from rest (v₀ = 0):

Finally, we can find the revolutions:

Therefore, the ball rotates 6.78 revolutions.
I hope it helps you!
Answer:

Explanation:
When the unpolarized light passes through the first polarizer, only the component of the light parallel to the axis of the polarizer passes through.
Therefore, after the first polarizer, the intensity of light passing through it is halved, so the intensity after the first polarizer is:

Then, the light passes through the second polarizer. In this case, the intensity of the light passing through the 2nd polarizer is given by Malus' law:

where
is the angle between the axes of the two polarizer
Here we have

So the intensity after the 2nd polarizer is

And substituting the expression for I1, we find:

I know that its not the second law. I'm almost positive its the first one. Please let me know if I'm wrong. This sentence makes no sense when you put it with the third law. So, the first law is my guess...