1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OLga [1]
4 years ago
13

How did Alexander Hamilton's and Thomas Jefferson's views toward the interpretation of the constitution differ?

History
2 answers:
zheka24 [161]4 years ago
8 0

<u> C. Alexander Hamilton believed in a loose interpretation, while Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation.</u>

Hamilton, as one of the leaders of the Federalist party, promoted the belief that Constitution was open to interpretation, thus the government had "unmentioned rights" to have additional powers, and also found necessary a strong national government. Jefferson strongly opposed to this way of thinking, which led him to be one of the founders of the Democratic-Republican party, a party that had a different view on how to lead a nation, including the conviction that the government should limit itself to what the Constitution says and nothing more.

Alex787 [66]4 years ago
7 0

C. Alex loose interpretation, Thomas strict interpretation

You might be interested in
In 1492, Portuguese explorers believed they could get to Asia more quickly by
stepan [7]
Hello there!


In 1492, Portuguese explorers believed they could get to Asia more quickly by <span>sailing around the southern tip of Africa.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
The department in the Executive Branch that deals with money for the USA is the Department of
Tems11 [23]
The answer should be B
3 0
3 years ago
The example of German immigrant Marcus Spiegel demonstrated that: a. the views of average Americans evolved considerably during
ch4aika [34]

Answer: how do i login to my sister’s account her friend gave to her?

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
From “No Compromise with the Evil of Slavery”
olasank [31]

A thief because he is stealing a human, kinda

8 0
3 years ago
What was wrong with the urban machine from the progressive point of view? We're we better off with it than without it?
Aliun [14]
Problems associated with the "urban machine" were that they were undemocratic and were corrupt. They moved the political system to allow candidates to win based upon vote-buying, coercion, and other corrupt methods. They were therefore effective or ineffective depending on the relationship you had with the machine and also whether or not you wanted to see a democratic system or not. 
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the north seem stronger than the south at the beginning of the civil war?
    13·2 answers
  • Culture is all the knowledge and values shared by a society, including changes brought about by technology. Which technology lea
    12·1 answer
  • To what does Okies refer?
    15·1 answer
  • In which political body does each state have the same number of votes, no matter how large or small its polutation
    6·1 answer
  • 28. This group of people created a phonetic
    5·1 answer
  • What was the biggest threat communism posed to the u.S.?
    14·1 answer
  • 1. In the 1600s, how did the economy of England push people to move to the South?
    13·1 answer
  • What was President Wilson's plan for peace?
    6·1 answer
  • What are the major trends in the time period 1450 to 1750?
    11·1 answer
  • Rewrite a popular song so that the lyrics represent the causes of the civil war write a brief chorus as well
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!