I dont exactly know if this is right, but i would say "crash" if youre being asked to fill in the blank. Thats what I would put. If you continue to drive while someone is in front of you, and you don't take any action to prevent it, you would crash into them. Sorry if this wrong, there wasnt much explanation!
Answer:
1- smartphone
2- computer
3- kindle
4- clothes
5- watch
Explanation:
The economy exists due to the human need for products and services.
Marketing is responsible for adapting such products and services to the individual needs of each person, in order to offer value to the customer, meeting their desires and preferences through features, personalization of products and services, benefits, customer service, advertising, communication , etc., for a company to be strategically competitive and improve profits.
Therefore, in relation to the products acquired by me last year, there are 3 technological products (smartphone, computer and kindle) that were acquired through the function of marketing features that satisfy the needs of work, communication and leisure.
The watch and clothes were acquired through the function of advertising marketing and differentiated design, which add value to the customer through the status they create in the consumer's mind.
Answer:
In a static storage area each product is assigned a specific area, whereas in dynamic storage, product locations and fluid and as such are subject to change.
Answer:According to the article, when companies earn patents specifically to prevent competition, it hinders the innovation of products that might actually be better. For instance, Bruce Nolop describes how his company had to pay more attention to the "minefield of existing patents than on the expected value that we could bring to customers." Rosabeth Moss Kanter suggests a "use it or lose it" solution to this problem. She thinks that a company that patents an item would be forced to use the patented idea or product or risk losing the patent. This idea would encourage more competition and prevent patent abuse.
Explanation: