1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
const2013 [10]
2 years ago
8

In two to three paragraphs, compare and contrast how people have historically treated natural resources and how this might chang

e, using your new understanding of scarcity, conservation, and private property.
History
2 answers:
Illusion [34]2 years ago
8 0
Compare and contrast how people have historically treated natural resources and how this might change, using your new understanding of scarcity, conservation, and private property.

Answer: In the past people treated natural resources as an infinite source of wealth and commodity. But now that we know that there are physical limits to nonrenewable resources we have taken a new approach to preserve this resources by taking measures like natural resource management. A great example of this would be a private property regime where the resources benefits and duties fall under the owner(s).

I hope it helps, Regards.
Paraphin [41]2 years ago
5 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Natural resources are non-renewable. People need to start acting responsibly to take care of the environment and not wasting valuable resources that will be much needed in the future.

In the case of water, there are countries and cities where people have to walk miles from their homes in order to get some fresh water for their families. We in the larger cities, just go to the faucet and drink and wast. That is not fair when poor people do not have this elemental resource.

We need to follow and respect conservation programs to protect the land and animals that give us the food we need. We order the food that we need and no more. No wasting. There are millions of people suffering too much hunger in the world.

And if we don't care about our limited resources, soon we will be facing scarcity of basic products. So let's be responsible and use only what we need.

You might be interested in
Please help me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
igor_vitrenko [27]
Mainly it served as a wake up call for the Union on how bloody this war would be. The casualties were about 23,000 combined, the most ever up till that point (soon to be usurped by Chancellorsville).

It was also both a learning experience for Grant, a boost in recognition and at the same time being a detriment. In the immediate aftermath reports across the nation accused Grant of being drunk (among other things) and allowed to have his men to be bayoneted in their tents due to his lack of defensive preperations falsely. The public demanded Lincon remove Grant from command but he famously responded
I cannot spare this man; he fights.At the same time General Halleck reorganized the Army and shuffled Grant to the second in command position. He would only be in such a position for a short time until Halleck would be sent East and Grant would reassume control.

Grant instead took this as a learning experience on preparedness that helped him through the War. He realized that the War would not be decided and ended in one battle but instead in many others. He also was (eventually) recognized for his clear judgment under stress and his ability to see the greater strategic situation.

Sherman also became a national name in the immediate aftermath of Shilo. His steadfastness and calmness under fire during the battle made up for his previous melancholy and defensive lapses in previous engagements.

<span>In the larger view it ended Confederate hopes of stopping the Union Invasion of Mississippi. It also allowed for the two Union armies in Tenessee to link up, assuring Confederate defeats in both states. The Confederacy also suffered the loss of General Albert Johnson who was extremely talented.

</span>ω<span>i truely hope this helps</span>ω<span>


</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Natasha wants to know whether adding coffee to the soil will help plants grow. She plants seeds in pots and adds coffee to the s
vivado [14]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

This will let her knows the deference between plant with coffee and plant without coffee and from this she will know if coffee helps plants grow or not

6 0
3 years ago
What has happened to the American ship in the picture to the right
Gnom [1K]
There is no picture.
4 0
3 years ago
4.
serious [3.7K]
I think it is b because
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List and describe two judicial powers that belong to Congress.
Nuetrik [128]
Original Jurisdiction: This is when a court is first hearing a case. This court is then said to have original jurisdiction.


Appellate Jurisdiction: This is when a case has been appealed (the original decision questioned) and another court hears the case.
8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is deviance? What is crime? Explain the difference between the two by giving examples.
    14·1 answer
  • Effects of the pearl harbor bombing
    7·1 answer
  • Which two events contributed to the spread of ancient Greek culture and literature?
    13·1 answer
  • The book was written in 1924 in the bavarian fortress of landsberg am lech, where hitler was imprisoned after the abortive beer
    5·2 answers
  • Which political party did James Madison participate in founding in the 1790s
    8·2 answers
  • On the day of Israel’s founding, neighboring Arab nations
    14·1 answer
  • what was the area within the Middle East that today is Israel, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq called?
    9·1 answer
  • 3 interesting facts about the nazi party
    12·1 answer
  • Explain the role of the United States in the Middle East prior to the Persian Gulf War?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the Supreme Court's
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!