Answer:
Negligible most of the time, or being able to flip a major party's success at best.
Explanation:
The United States is known to be using a mostly 2 party system ever since the nation was created. The current two major parties are the Republican Party and the Democratic Party, and currently are the only two that actually win presidential elections. At best, the the largest third party (Independents) have seats within Congress, but never have they actually have a representative elected as president.
However, note what I stated at the end of the answer. Third party representatives within the US government is essential to be won over especially when trying to pass controversial party-aligned bills that may not garner support from the opposition. In cases like these, the major parties would try to appease the third parties in order to flip the majority vote to their side. In this case, they play an important role in influencing the US politics, but in any other cases, they are merely representative at best.
~
Answer:
Argue against the use of genetically modified food
Explanation:
The use of genetically modified food is not recommendable as it entails several hazards towards the physical and mental well-being of a person. Consuming these kinds of food may cause someone to suffer from cancer and other health threatening diseases. This is due to the fact that genetically modified food will contain certain chemicals that help them become what they are. This is not safe since a lot of chemicals and their reactions are things that could lead into an inexorable amount of damage to the body of an individual.
Answer:
In order to pay the interest due on the new bonds, the government established revenues from tariffs, tonnage duties and excises. It also chartered and partially owned a new central bank, the Bank of the United States, which provided loans to the government as well as to merchants and other businesses.
Explanation:
<span>a. Southern congressmen opposed the banning of slavery from the new territories
</span><span>Northern states and southern states were at odds over the potential spread of slavery in new states and what that would do to the balance of power in Congress. <span>
In 1846, Congressman David Wilmot of Pennsylvania introduced the proviso as an amendment to an appropriations bill in connection with the peace treaty being negotiated with Mexico. His amendment stipulated that any territory gained from Mexico would be free, not allowing slavery. Wilmot's amendment passed in the House of Representatives, but was unable to get approval in the Senate. The Compromise of 1850, a package of five bills passed by Congress in September of that year, sought to accommodate some of the issues both South and North were debating over during those years. But we know that war over the slavery issue was yet to come.</span></span>
Answer:
Suffrage in some Western states, Catt's "Winning Plan," the Nineteenth Amendment
