Explanation:
Hamilton made two principal points in the essay. First, he argued for the independence of the judiciary from the other two branches of government, the executive and the legislative. In presenting a case for the judiciary, he reached his second major conclusion: that the judiciary must be empowered to strike down laws passed by Congress that it deems "contrary to the manifest tenor of the Constitution."
In presenting his argument for the independence of the judiciary, Hamilton claimed that it was by far the weakest of the three branches. It did not, he said, have the "sword" of the executive, who is commander in chief of the nation's armed forces, nor the "purse" of the legislature, which approves all the tax and spending measures of the national government. It had, according to Hamilton, "neither FORCE nor WILL but merely judgment."
---------------------THANK YOU------------------------------
Answer,
Aquinas Aristotle is the father of political science and Machiavelli is the father modern political science.
Explanation,
Aristotle was Philosopher from greek.He wrote so many subjects which include geology,poetry ,natural science and ethics.He known as the Father of politics because his work was entirely politics.Niccolo Machiavelli was the father of modern political science.He wrote a book named The Prince which was about modern political philosophy.He was a senior official in the Florentine republic.He believed it was better to be feared than loved becaused a feared ruler ruled by fear of punishment and a ruler who is loved rules by retaining authority by obligation.
Hi there!
I'm glad you've joined Brainly.
During the rise and peak of Islam, a very structured and organized law system was established based according to the Quran and religion which had been highly depended upon. Due to this, many people did not commit crimes, steal, or lie, knowing that their Lord may punish them. Therefore, this all comes down to establish the very core of the matter: the caliph set laws and punishments which were all agreed upon by scholars, community elders, and respected Muslims.
The caliphs of that age had a system which they called Hokm Islami. This translates to Islamic rule without force. Later, the Ottomans established the forced rule for all, based on certain groups and religion types.
Abu Bakr set many limits on himself as other Caliphs had done. This included equality of wealth for all. There had been a treasury which they called "Bait Ul-Mal" , which the Caliph was not allowed to take money from, unless it was to help the community or poor folks. The Caliph also limited himself to water and basic food to live. He lived in a humble home as other men did.
Aside from money, the Caliph Abu Bakr also made sure that he did not order anything unless it was backed by the Quran, and agreed upon.
I hope this helped. If not, please comment below and I'd certainly be glad to elaborate and add to this description. Thanks! :)
