Answer:
(a) Adam Smith - Believed that that in a capitalist, free-market system, all economic agents are coordinated under "the invisible hand", and this results in the benefit of all of them.
(b) Thomas Malthus - Believed that while increased food production rose standards of living, the effect was only temporary, because the same rise in food supply lead to a rise in population growth, and there would a time when there would be too many people to be fed. (the Malthusian Catastrophe).
(c) David Ricardo - He opposed mercantilism, and argued instead that unrestrained free trade benefited every nations. This is because of the concept of comparative advantage: under a free trade systems, nations would specialize in those industries they do best, and import anything that they do not produce.
The power to make laws
the power to make treaties
Basiclly the pope can do whatever he wants as long as it is in the name of God.
It seems that you have missed the necessary options for us to answer this question, but anyway, here is the answer. If a company <span>claims that its products are better quality than other similar products, the type of competition presented in this scenario is Nonprice competition. Hope this helps.</span>
The basic outline of the purpose and beliefs that the constitution stands for.
There are certain ways as to how to manage conflict and this is based on conflict management but not all gives a win-win situation. The two ways in which <span>a person should approach conflict to ensure a win-win situation are collaborating and accommodating. Hope this answers your question. Have a great day ahead!</span>
