Answer:
Narrative History
Explanation:
Narrative history is a method of writing history in a story-based format. This way of writing history makes past events more interesting as readers can interpret and analyze these pieces of information in a way that is relatable to modern understanding. It is divided into two forms namely; the traditional and modern narratives.
- The traditional narrative follows a chronological format.
- The modern narrative explains trends that influenced certain actions of people in the past and reasons why they did certain things.
Natural law is the orderly principles -- the laws of nature -- that govern the functioning of nature everywhere, from atoms to ecosystems to galaxies. ... They felt that, through knowledge ofnatural law, both science andgovernment would promote the goals of freedom and happiness of the people
The answer is D. He is not a part of sherlocks fam, and he is more in awe of sherlock rather than jealous and he is certainly not a genius.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can comment on the following.
The fossil discovered in the 1950s that reinforced the hypothesis that Africa was the birthplace of humanity was the "Australopithecus Africanus."
At the end of the 1940s, beginning of the 1950s, renowned archeologists John T Robinson and Robert Broom excavated the Sterkfontein Caves in South Africa and discovered a 2.3 million-year-old fossil they called "Mrs. Ples," or the Australopithecus Africanus.
Anthropologists consider that South Africa is the cradle of humanity. They think that the first hominids appeared there and they spread to other regions of the earth. The oldest one of the hominids was the Australopithecus and it is considered to have appeared on earth approximately five million years ago. The latest form of hominids, the H*mo Sapiens -you and I- appeared approximately 200,000 years ago.
The correct answer is the Louisiana Purchase.
While the President has the power to negotiate treaties, Jefferson likely got quite a bit ahead of himself when the land was purchased before the consent of the United States Senate.
Furthermore, the Federalists believed that the acquisition of territory itself might be unconstitutional.
