Answer:
Social forces involved: group relationship
Ethical values involved: honesty, concern and respect for others, responsibility
Explanation:
To begin with, it is important to stand out that Nelson has no right to sue Baker, since Baker is entitled to reject the counteroffer made by Nelson if said offer does not meet his needs. According to contract law, the buyer, Nelson, has the possibility of not accepting the counteroffer. In the case at issue, Nelson did not comply with some ethical values such as "concern and respect for others". Instead of following the correct procedures so as to sell his house, he directly sued Baker. Baker might have felt intimidated by Nelson when he said that he "accepted the offer as amended". There is Nelson's abuse of power. The value of "honesty" has not been respected either, since he sued Baker immediately.
Baker complied with other values such as respect and responsibility, since he followed the procedures fixed for this type of transaction by notifying the other party that he was not accepting the counteroffer.
Answer:
Truth-telling
Explanation:
Autonomy is the principle of ethical rule regulation in research, counseling, psychotherapy, etc. Autonomy is a principle that is related to the choice of a person for self whether there is presented the alternatives of the choices. There is no load over the client or subjects. It is a researcher or a therapist's responsibility to make the client or subjects autonomous value respectful.
We can not say that it is a natural characteristic of a person but it is the combination of bio, psycho and social environment in which a person survives. The autonomy is dynamic so it changes by the time, ages or position of a person.
The only one that makes sense is C. Air Pollution.
Andrea and Nick both want higher education at their chosen university.
1) talk to them about it
2) tell them a better way
3)suggest a different way using a different example
Hope this helps... mark as Brainliest plz