Answer:
Students will be allowed to eat lunch on the hill outside of the cafeteria if the noise level is kept down, they stay on the hill, and trash is cleaned up afterward. If students can not be noisy, have all their trash picked up afterward, and not enter other buildings during lunch, then they can eat on the hill outside the cafeteria.
Explanation:
Students will be allowed to eat lunch on the hill outside of the cafeteria if the noise level is kept down, they stay on the hill, and trash is cleaned up afterward. If students can not be noisy, have all their trash picked up afterward, and not enter other buildings during lunch, then they can eat on the hill outside the cafeteria .
The sentences that fix the comma splice are:
- A. These shoes are too expensive, but I am going to buy them anyway.
- B. These shoes are too expensive; I am going to buy them anyway.
<h3>What is a Comma Splice?</h3>
This refers to the occurrence of improperly placed commas between two complete sentences.
Hence, we can see that to correct the comma splice, there would be the use of commas and semi colons to join the independent clauses in the sentences and are options A and B.
Read more about comma splices here:
brainly.com/question/8047911
#SPJ1
A is the answer. The verb in the sentence is are and are is a linking verb.
Hello. You did not submit the texts to which the question refers. The texts are:
#1 The Case for Mars By: Alexander Fisher
#2 Mars—A Waste of Time and Money By: Juniper Springs
Answer and Explanation:
1. The authors had opposing views. While Fisher considers exploration and Mars to be a positive thing that will benefit humanity, Springs believes that exploration is a waste of money and that it is very dangerous for humans.
2. The authors use the same point of comparison, since both discuss in their arguments, the atmosphere of Mars, the technology used, the limitation of robots and the possibility of using Mars to escape from the problems of the earth.
3. The authors present support their points of view in different ways, as one shows positive evidence about the exploration of Mars, while the other shows negative evidence. An example of this can be seen when Fisher says that exploration of Mars could promote wonderful technological elements for humanity, while Springs says that exploration will be a waste of money and that this money should be used to solve problems that the earth presents.
4. Both focus more on logical appeals, although they present some moments of emotional appeals, especially Springs' text, which tries to stimulate a certain dread of Mars exploration.
