Participants will respond to extraordinarily high ration requirements when reinforcement requirements are thinned gradually over a long period, similar to FR schedules.
<h3>What are reinforcement schedule?</h3>
The precise rules that are applied to offer (or remove) reinforcers (or punishers) after a specific operant activity are known as schedules of reinforcement. These guidelines are outlined in terms of the duration and/or quantity of replies necessary to provide (or remove) a reinforcer (or a punisher).
<h3>What are FR schedules?</h3>
Reinforcement is only delivered after a predetermined number of replies under a fixed-ratio schedule (FR schedule) in conditioning. "FR 1" denotes that reinforcement is given following each response; "FR 50" denotes that reinforcement is given following each of the first 50 responses; and so forth.
Learn more about reinforcement schedule: brainly.com/question/12282349
#SPJ4
The US tariff policy in the 1930's is most accurately represented by the statement:The Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act tariff rates were higher than the<span>Hawley-Smoot ones.</span>
Answer:
intervening variable
Explanation:
A hypothesis variable used to expound causal relationships between different variables is an intervention variable. In an experiment, intervening variables can not really be tested (this is why they are hypothesized). There is, for instance, a correlation between a poor person and a shorter life span.
Answer:
A change to the system so that it does not rely so heavily on human memory
Explanation:
The error made by Isadora is could be attributed or classed as human error because what happened to her could happen to an experienced surgeon as well. Has her error was due to confusion which could alps stem form tiredness, weariness and other personal issues. Therefore, they are several ways in which issues like these could be curtailed and prevented from reoccurring in the future. However, the most important is to perform a system change or overhaul regarding having to rely on surgeons(human) to have to calculate Recall this information in memory, rather a computerized performance of this procedure would be more reliable and less prone to confusion.
Answer:
concurrent validity.
Explanation:
Concurrent validity is a type of evidence that can be gathered to defend the use of a test for predicting other outcomes. It is a parameter used in sociology, psychology, and other psychometric or behavioral sciences.
