Answer: (d) liability - refundable deposits.
Explanation:
The refundable deposit of $1,000 was a liability because Growler owed it to the customer and were simply holding it for when the customer returned the equipment.
Upon receipt of the deposit, they credited the Refundable deposits accounts which is a liability account. Now that the customer has returned the cleaning equipment and the deposit is to be refunded to the customer, Growler should now debit the Refundable deposits account to cancel out the liability.
First let us identify if the asset is a gain
or loss. An asset is a gain if it contributes to the banks overall finance while
it is a loss if it is a cost directly or indirectly.
Deposits of $300 million = Gain (+)
Reserves of $20 million = Gain (+)
<span>Purchased government bonds worth $300 million
= Loss (-) ---> This entails
cost</span>
Selling bank’s loans at current market value
of $600 million = Gain (+)
Therefore adding up everything to get the banks net worth:
Stealth banks net worth = $300 M + $20 M - $300 M + $600 M
<span>Stealth banks net
worth = $620 million</span>
Answer:
The best recommendation to be made to this client is to do nothing.
Explanation:
Investment in stock is a highly risky investment because price of stock often fluctuates which can make an investor to lose a lot of money.
From the question, the client is already old at age 67 with a low income and he does not have any other liquid assets apart from the annual income of $25,000, mainly from social security and interest on funds held in a bank savings account.
Since losing so much money through investment in stock is not affordable to him, the best recommendation to be made to this client is to that he should do nothing.
Answer:
Ricardo’s Theory of Comparative Advantage
Explanation:
Comparative advantage is the term used to define the ability of an individual, firm or country to produce a particular good or service at a lower opportunity cost than that if it’s competitors or trade partners. Opportunity cost is the benefit lost from the second best alternative.
When a country can produce a product more efficiently (i.e maximum output using minimum resources) than that of its trade partners, it is known as that it has absolute advantage in that product. India tends to have absolute advantage in both business processes outsourcing as well as producing agricultural commodities as it is mentioned that it can produce both of these more efficiently than the United States.
However, although it has absolute advantage in both, it is still less efficient in producing agricultural commodities when compared to business process outsourcing. In other words, if it attempts to produce agricultural commodities in-house, the benefit lost from the second best alternative: business process outsourcing is high. The opportunity cost is higher when it produces agricultural commodities than it is when it does business process outsourcing. Hence, due to the law of comparative advantage, it chooses to specialize in business process outsourcing and imports agricultural commodities.
Based on the percentage of readers who own a particular make of the car and the random sample, we can infer that there is sufficient evidence at a 0.02 level to support the executive claim.
<h3>What is the evidence to support the executive's claim?</h3>
The hypothesis is:
Null hypothesis : P = 0.55
Alternate hypothesis : P ≠ 0.55
We then need to find the test statistic:
= (Probability found by marketing executive - Probability from publisher) / √( (Probability from publisher x (1 - Probability from publisher))/ number of people sampled
= (0.46 - 0.55) / √(( 0.55 x ( 1 - 0.55)) / 200
= -2.56
Using this z value as the test statistic, perform a two-tailed test to show:
= P( Z < -2.56) + P(Z > 2.56)
= 0.0052 + 0.0052
= 0.0104
The p-value is 0.0104 which is less than the significance level of 0.02. This means that we reject the null hypothesis.
The Marketing executive was correct.
Find out more on the null and alternate hypothesis at brainly.com/question/25263462
#SPJ1
