All categories

3 years ago

As a business owner, how do you allocate your resources properly?

Business

1 answer:

Afina-wow [57]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

i dont know, but what i do know is that i miss you. Im sorry and i've said it a million times and i've gotten to the point, that i dont think you love me anymore, i know it hurt, im sorry, but i will never do something like that again, ever. im sorry Jose, please talk to me. I LOVE YOU. I havent ever loved anyone as much as i love you. You give me butterflys 24/7 no matter what we're talking about. It's killing me right now knowing that you're hurting and i can't do anything about it. Please Jose come back to me.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

You bought one of Great White Shark Repellant Co.'s 8 percent coupon bonds one year ago for $810. These bonds make annual paymen

Gennadij [26K]

Answer:

real rate of return = 4.77%

Explanation:

you purchased the bond at $810 with 14 years to maturity

now, 1 year later the bond's price is:

PV of coupon payment = $1,000 / 1.11¹³ = $257.51
PV of coupon payments = $80 x 6.7499 (PV annuity factor, 11%, 13 periods) = $539.99

market value = $797.50

total nominal returns = $80 (coupon payment) + ($797.50 - $810) = $67.50

the real rate of return = {[1 + ($67.50/$810)] / (1 + 3.4%)} - 1 = 4.77%

8 0

3 years ago

A director violates the corporate opportunity doctrine if he or she competes with the corporation, unless the disinterested dire

DIA [1.3K]

The given statement " A director violates the corporate opportunity doctrine if he or she competes with the corporation, unless the disinterested directors approve of the director's actions " is TRUE

Explanation:

A business opportunity applies to any business opportunity that a client may gain.

The Corporate Opportunity law controls the moral responsibility of directors, managers and managing stockholders in an organisation, with loyalty responsibilities, not to misuse such incentives without first offering to the corporate board the right to reject the opportunity on behalf of the company.

When these actions are broken and a director of the company takes the chance, then the trustee has abused his obligation to be trustworthy and will be able to maintain a constructive trust with the proceeds arising from the incorrect transaction.

8 0

4 years ago

Semiautomatic process has a fixed cost of $40,000 per year and variable cost of $30 per unit. An automatic process has fixed cos

GuDViN [60]

Answer:

Total cost= 40,000 + 30X

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

The semiautomatic process has a fixed cost of $40,000 per year and a variable cost of $30 per unit.

We need to use the following formula:

Total cost= fixed costs + unitary variable cost*X

Total cost= 40,000 + 30X

3 0

3 years ago

Which of the following are elements you should include in meeting minutes? Check all that apply.

GREYUIT [131]

Answer:

The correct answer are A and D.

Explanation:

Meeting minutes is the one which involve the name of the group, time as well as date and the place of the meeting, names of the absentees and attendees, record and reports of old business as well as new business, approval of previous minutes, the precious wording of motions which comprise of action taken and vote and the person signature and name.

6 0

4 years ago

Kaspar and Ludger, two unrelated calendar year corporations, have the following transactions for 2019: Kaspar Corporation Ludger

Karolina [17]

Answer:

The dividends received deduction <u>for Kaspar Corporation is $70,000</u>, while the dividends received deduction f<u>or Ludger Corporation is $230,000</u>.

Explanation:

Note that the data in the question are merged together but they are first sorted in the attached excel file before answering the question as follows:

The dividends received deduction refers a federal tax deduction that are enjoyed in the U.S. by some corporations that receives dividends from related entities.

Based on the general rule for dividends received deduction, if the ownership by the company receiving the dividend in the company paying the dividend is less than 20%, the dividends received deduction is the 70% of the dividend received.

Since both Kaspar and Ludger have just 15% ownership which is less than 20% in domestic corporation from which they received dividends, their dividends received deduction can therefore be determined using the following formula:

Dividend received deduction = Dividend received * 70% .............. (1)

Using equation (1), we have:

Kaspar's dividend received deduction = $100,000 * 70% = $70,000

Ludger's dividend received deduction = $230,000 * 70% = $161,000

Therefore, the dividends received deduction for Kaspar Corporation is $70,000, while the dividends received deduction for Ludger Corporation is $230,000.

Download xlsx

8 0

3 years ago