Answer:
Sometimes sales representatives could be able to tell lies, steal customers from other coworkers, get customers in an inappropriate way.
Explanation:
There will always be the possibility of a behavior aimed at financial obsession by the sales representatives involved in the bonus process.
It is important to consider how excessive greed could have a fundamental role to play improperly against the rest of the team of the sales force; Therefore, it is an incentive that while on the one hand, it could be very beneficial for the company by offering the possibility of a significant increase in the company's sales.
On the other hand, it is necessary to consider the possible problems of deception and greed that could be presented among the fellow sales representatives. In my opinion, this should be an activity that needs to be monitored very closely in order to be highly beneficial for the group in general.
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the given case it is valid contract as there is time, promise, benefit and obligation to do thing. But verbal contracts are difficult to prove. Stan and Byron have a verbal contract which is a promise for 10 days and the contract has exchange of goods for $600. Offer is made by Byron but the acceptance is not yet given by Stan.
Here only the offer is made and it is not yet accepted by Byron. here Stan has revoked the offer through letter so the revoke has been communicated to the other party through letter. So in this case there is no breach of contract as the contract was clearly revoked by Stan through his letter.
Answer:
Conyers = $38,580
Poodle = $222,420
Explanation:
Annual salary allowance to Poodle of $146,160.
Interest of 6% on each partner's capital balance on January 1.
Any remaining net income divided to Conyers and Poodle, 1:2.
net income $261,000
distribution of interests:
- Conyers = $54,000 x 6% = $3,240
- Poodle = $93,000 x 6% = $5,580
drawings (annual salary allowance):
remaining income = $261,000 - $146,160 - $3,240 - $5,580 = $106,020
- Conyers (1/3) = $35,340
- Poodle (2/3) = $70,680
total distributed:
- Conyers = $3,240 + $35,340 = $38,580
- Poodle = $5.580 + $146,160 + $70,680 = $222,420
Answer:
Net income = $76,000
Earning per share (EPS):
Income from continuing operations per share = $4.40 per share
Loss from discontinued operations per share = -$3.64 per share
Net Income per share = $0.76 per share
Explanation:
Note: See the attached excel file for the income statement.
Also Note: Two years (2016 and 2018) were mistakenly mentioned in the question instead of just one of them. I therefore picked 2016 to prepare the income statement.
In the attached excel file, the earning per share (EPS) is calculated as follows:
Number of shares outstanding = 100,000 shares
Income from continuing operations per share = Income from continuing operations / Number of shares outstanding = $440,000 / 100,000 = $4.40 per share
Loss from discontinued operations per share = Loss from discontinued operations / Number of shares outstanding = -$364,000 / 100,000 = -$3.64 per share
Net Income per share = Net Income / Number of shares outstanding = $76,000 / 100,000 = $0.76 per share
