he Dunning School's interpretation not only shaped how historians viewed Reconstruction, but the public's view also. This can be clearly seen "with the many newspaper editorials written about it." (Option B)
<h3>
How did the Dunning School View Reconstructing?</h3>
He believed that Reconstruction had harmed the South and that the deployment of the US Army to regulate state politics had infringed on American principles.
He believed that freedmen had shown incapable of self-government, necessitating segregation.
Learn more about Reconstruction:
brainly.com/question/24761999
#SPJ1
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, neither mention the plans referred, we can say the following.
The plans put forth at the Constitutional Convention adequately addressed the problems that existed under the Articles of Confederation to the extent that these allowed the creation of the new Constitution for the United States with a solid central government that included many powers that did not exist under the Articles of Confederation.
Let's have in mind that under the Articles of Confederation, the central government was weak. It was the states the only ones that could raise money through taxation. Congress was very limited.
That is why the delegates et at the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in the city of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to create the new form of government.
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
It is A. since Checks and Balances were written to be followed in the Congress so there could be separate 3 branches and none of the branches can overpower since they all have the same power.
<span>Some here say China was weak, the losers in all wars are the weaker combatant. People here want to act like this was different than other wars but this is just how most wars are fought. One nation is stronger than the other so it forces its will on the weaker nation. An example would be the CCP forcing its will on the people of Tibet. China was the stronger and Tibet was the weaker. Sometimes the weaker nation can prolong these conflicts long enough that it becomes too costly for the stronger nation to continue. Then the weaker nation can get better conditions. China had the advantage of geography, it was very expensive for the foreign nations to fight in China but China had no unity or will. The powers in control cared little about what they had to give up, they figured the Chinese people would pay for the cost. The rules only care was to retain power. But the foreign nations did have superior everything.</span>
