In the Cold War, the United States (USA) and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) were at odds with each other because of strongly different worldviews. The USA was committed to capitalism and democratic institutions of government, whereas the USSR was committed to communism and imposed authoritarian government. Initially, the USA had atomic weapons and the USSR did not. (The US would not share that technology with the Soviets, who had been their ally in World War II.) But once the Soviets developed their own atomic weaponry, this led to a massive arms race between the superpowers. The two nations kept escalating their weapons capabilities and stockpiles. It got to the point that if the two sides did plunge into war, they would face mutually assured destruction. John Foster Dulles, the Secretary of State under President Eisenhower, wanted a change from what had been the "containment policy" which the US had followed during the Truman Administration, as recommended then by American diplomat George F. Kennan. Dulles felt the containment approach put the United States in a weak position, because it only was reactive, trying to contain communist aggression when it occurred. Dulles sought to push America's policy in a more active direction; some have labeled his approach "brinkmanship." In an article in LIFE magazine in 1956, Dulles said, "The ability to get to the verge without getting into the war is the necessary art." He wasn't afraid to threaten massive retaliation against communist enemy countries as a way of intimidating them.
Eventually (after decades of the arms race and tensions) the US and USSR would pursue policies of detente, which included pledges to reduce their nuclear arsenals. The arms race and solving the arms race were constant issues affecting the Cold War.
<span>This was a declaration by the House of Commons of England reaffirming their right to freedom of speech in the face of King James' belief that they had no right to debate foreign policy. Many Members of Parliament were unhappy with James' foreign policy. They opposed the Spanish Match and wished for a war against Spain. The MPs believed that if they conceded that they had no right to debate matters which displeased the King, Parliament would be obsolete</span>
<span><span>"african american" for part of the u.s. population.<span><span>Ask for details </span><span>Follow </span>Report</span><span> by <span>YeoItzJenny6815 </span>3 hours ago</span></span><span><span>Your answer </span> (QUIT)</span><span><span>Leoclara2031 </span> BeginnerADD YOUR ANSWER</span></span>
<span>Don't worry I got you. The Qing Rule was known as a rule of both Peace and Prosperity. Hope I helped</span>
Answer:
u deniably, the Middle East has numerous issues that cannot be summed up in a column. Some issues, however, have a broader reach than others — they not only influence governmental policy, but also affect the everyday lives of the people that live in the region. I believe there to be three issues that are the top sources of all the major conflicts in the Middle East.
The Middle East, which geographically largely consists of desert, has serious issues with water consumption. To combat this problem, many desalination centers process salty water from the ocean, resulting in water that is adequate for consumption. In fact, Nature Middle East, a Middle Eastern scientific journal, holds that 70 percent of the world’s desalination plants are located in the Middle East. The desalination process, however, is environmentally problematic since leftover salt is often pumped back into the ocean, destroying marine environments. Water issues have caused not only environmental, but also monetary concern for Middle Easterners; in Jordan, the cost of water has increased by 30 percent in the past 10 years, according to a report by The Water Project. The water dilemma is incredibly important to the region and is a central cause of quarrel among countries. The Middle East also needs to focus on this issue because at the current rate of consumption, the Emirates Industrial Bank predicts United Emirates alone will deplete its water resources in less than 50 years.
Explanation:
