I believe the answer is: high approach motivated
People with high approach motivation tend to be really curious, and would always go out of their way to fill up their schedule.
They are much more likely to stay committed in pursuing their interest, but they often possess narrow attention and might ignore everything that does not attract their interest
Answer:
There are some reasons behind the political instability in Nepal.First is the volatile internal political structure. The Nepalese leaders have not been able to institutionalize the political changes and have been experimenting with different systems. The Palace was also involved in this thing.Next is the geo -political interests of India, china and the western powers. Their struggle to maintain their influence in Nepal did not allowed Nepali politics to be stable. They got involved in change of leadership and systems in Nepal so that their interests could be established. India seems to be wanting complete control over Nepali leadership and then in over the economy, hydro power, and other developmental activities. It wants Nepal to be dependent over itself and so far is successful in it. China is more concerned about Free Tibet movement. There are many Tibetan refugees in Nepal. The Western powers, with the help from India, want to utilize the Tibetan refugees for Free Tibet movement.Next is the lack of strong alternative political leadership. Nepalese people have to vote for the same inefficient political leadership every time. Also, the Nepalese voters are not willing sufficiently to change the leadership
Explanation:
Categorizing family members based on their hair color would be an example of "Family Resemblance Theory."
This is based on the idea that "Family Resemblance Theory is a theory that tried to explain the similarities in the family or things generally on commonly shared features.
Here, trying to categorize people or distinguish them based on the shared features, such as hair color, is an example of family resemblance theory.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the family resemblance theory defined things based on similarities among them.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/10436935
Answer:
Atlas is probably developing gross motor skills like being able to walk on their tiptoes or to stand on one foot. They are developing fine motor skills like being able to snip things with scissors.
Explanation:
It seems from the question prompt that Atlas is probably about 3 years old and they are acquiring gross motor skills like being able to climb well and to skip. They are also starting to refine their fine motor skills at this age and they can use scissors and hold a crayon and eat themselves. By age 4 they will be able to manipulate clay for example. This is the stage where children are moving beyond just performing parallel play at 2 years old to associative play at 3 to 4 years old.
Answer:
Can you please tell me what story.