1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aivan3 [116]
3 years ago
10

The mind is not part of the physical world at all. physical things are extended; they take up space. and they are not conscious.

our minds, on the other hand, are conscious and do not take up space. minds and bodies are as fundamentally different as things could be.
Social Studies
1 answer:
romanna [79]3 years ago
6 0

The above is an example of what is referred to as Substance dualism. It posits that there are two essentially different types of substances. These are physical or material substances and mental substances . According to substance dualism, mind and body are distinct and the minds does not depend on the body to exist

You might be interested in
Analyze Menes' decision to make Memphis the capital of Egypt. Why do you think he decided on that location instead of another gr
Agata [3.3K]

Memphis, city and capital of ancient Egypt and an important centre during much of Egyptian history. Memphis is located south of the Nile River delta, on the west bank of the river, and about 15 miles (24 km) south of modern Cairo. Closely associated with the ancient city’s site are the cemeteries, or necropolises, of Memphis, where the famous pyramids of Egypt are located. From north to south the main pyramid fields are: Abū Ruwaysh, Giza, Zāwiyat al-ʿAryān, Abū Ṣīr, Ṣaqqārah, and Dahshūr. The Memphis archaeological zone was designated a UNESCO World Heritage site in 1979.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following statements about circumpolar stars is true at all latitudes?
olga55 [171]

Answer:

A. They always remain above your horizon.

Explanation:

A circumpolar star is a star that always remains above your horizon.

5 0
3 years ago
Most african-americans enthusiastically favored the colonization idea and moving to africa.
dlinn [17]

False.

They had been scorned and hostile via maximum unfastened African people.

<u>Purpose</u>: To progressively lose slaves, by buying them, and sending them to Africa.

A huge motivator behind African colonization changed into the preference to unfold Christianity at some stage in the sector. much like what passed off in North and South America, EU colonizers brought the Christian religion to Africa through missionaries

Learn more about colonization idea and moving to africa here

brainly.com/question/457399

#SPJ4

5 0
2 years ago
If you were Harriet Tubman Would you go back after having a taste of freedom to risk your life over and over again to save the l
Airida [17]

I would, for the simple fact of she saved many peoples lives. She impacted so many peoples lives, but in a good way. African Americans were treated so poorly and pushed around like dogs, she helped around 70 of the people treated like this. Those 70 people might've died if she hadn't done that. She inspired other people to make a stand. To talk out against all of this. She didn't have to, but she did. Why? Because she was treated like a dog herself. She was born into slavery and eventually escaped. She must've thought that if she could do it herself, she could help others. Once she felt freedom, how amazing it felt, she had the courage to go back and help other slaves. Even at the risk of being caught, she still did it. After helping the people she did, she must've had an amazing feeling. Even though she didn't have to, she did. It had to have given her a sense of happiness. After saving other people, and giving them the freedom they deserved. This one woman, Harriet Tubman, had an impact, and if she hadn't done what she did, well, who knows. Men always said that women aren't strong enough to do that, she proved them wrong. Well, so did other women but Harriet Tubman, I think was someone who impacted the most.

I would put your own spin on it, and also it 19 lines...

3 0
3 years ago
What type of society is described as having very little inequality, no divisions of rich and poor, few differenced in power, emp
Yuliya22 [10]

Answer: Hunting and gathering Societies.

Explanation: Hunting and gathering societies are described as having very little inequality, no divisions of rich and poor, few differenced in power, emphasis on cooperation rather than competition, participatory decision making, and an elaborate ceremonial life. However, hunting and gathering societies rely primarily on hunting wild animals, fishing, and gathering wild fruits, berries, nuts, and vegetables to feed themselves.

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Is there any disadvantage to a government subsidizing domestic firms to make them able to compete in price with cheaper imported
    8·1 answer
  • Which is the best definition of literal language?
    5·1 answer
  • Ethan likes to sing and play the guitar and wants to pursue a career in country music. However, his parents advise him to take u
    10·1 answer
  • Between 1713 and 1763 which country lost most of its land
    13·1 answer
  • A student studies a plant specimen. The student notices that the plant has seeds that are enclosed by a fruit. Which term can th
    11·1 answer
  • I need help I am behind in school and i need this to be fished or i will be in big trouble
    13·2 answers
  • What did Ellen ochoa did in space?
    15·2 answers
  • Please help i'll give brainliest​
    11·2 answers
  • The first resource for guidance when a businessperson or a professional accountant faces an ethical problem should be:__________
    14·1 answer
  • A ________________ can be used to graphically represent a website’s structure and
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!