Answer:The hate for people of color, is just as it was from 1700's to now in America. It's just hidden, swept under the rug. On application's why do they ask for our RACE & ETHNICITY???? To prepare themselves for people of COLOR???? May GOD BLESS America & help all of us to love one another COLORED BLIND, where race & our ethnicity doesn't matter. America can start the ball rolling by making it mandatory that we have to know the true American history, BLACK,HISPANIC,INDIANS, ASIAN'S we all helped in making America great!!!!!! And stop teaching clombus founded America!!!! Indians & Hispanics where here way before clombus landed on America's shores
Explanation:
Hi, Zoe! I believe the answer is the year 3272. Correct me if I am wrong! Hope I helped! :)
Option B, Those who believed in a laissez-faire strategy to the economics would likely not have voted for the Progressive Party in 1912.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The U.S. Progressive Party was founded by former President Theodore Roosevelt in 1912 after he had lost his former protector and Progressive rival President William Howard Taft's presidential nomination to the Republican Party.
Economist Adam Smith introduced laissez-faire économique to the globe in the 18th century, saying that markets and industries work best if the state does less or no. Throughout the years, there has been a laissez-faire policy for different outcomes.
Progressivism was an aspect of a response against the laissez-faire economy and its focus on an unregulated industry. Progressives widely believed that the industrial revolution and urbanization had formed many problems in society. Reformers began to doubt the market economy capacity to address those problems.
Answer:
I don't know...call me crazy, but I don't think this would be such a bad idea (at least sometime in the future.) With the advent of the internet, there really is no reason why people can't have more input on legislation. Remember, congressmen act as representatives of the people for logistical reasons. Were voting allowed via internet, mail, or permanent polling places, the logistical roadblocks are reduced.
This country has an annoying quality where senators and representatives are elected and then inject their own personality into their voting. They are supposed to represent the people of their district. If 60% of the people in their district feel a certain way about an issue, why is the congressman/woman allowed to vote a different way? Why do their personal beliefs really matter at all? They are supposed to be voting the way their district wants regardless of what they personally believe.
I know, I know, things can be horribly complicated and the average person can't possibly understand all the issues they are voting on, but last I checked their is no intelligence requirement to be in the government...many people in governement now are dumb as a box of rocks. They don't have to be smart to be elected, they have to be personable and have good advisors working in the background.
Imagine being able to directly vote on education issues, warfare issues, and being able to prioritize budget items. Instead of blaming the morons in congress we would only be able to blame ourselves when things went horribly wrong. Of course, some form of standing governement would still be needed for a lot of reasons.
Again, I know the technology is not hot enough right now to provide the secruity that would be needed, etc, but it won't be long...
I think its Hindu but then again I may be wrong
Hope this helps anyway. :)
