1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
choli [55]
4 years ago
9

How did Regents v. Bakke change affirmative action policies?

History
2 answers:
vovangra [49]4 years ago
8 0

The correct answer is A) It struck down the use of strict racial quotas.

<em>The Regents v Bakke changed affirmative action policies in that it struck down the use of strict racial quotas. </em>

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke was a Supre Court case of October 12, 1977, and decided on June 26, 1978. Alan Bakke had been rejected twice by the University of California Medical School at Davis. The University reserved 16 places for “minorities.” But Bakke had better marks than the minorities students admitted. The Supreme Court agreed that the University’s use of racial quotas was against the Constitution and ordered the University to accept Bakke.

34kurt4 years ago
5 0
<span>Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. It upheld affirmative action, allowing race to be one of several factors in college admission policy.
</span><span>
Regents v. Bakke change affirmative action policies by striking </span>down the use of strict racial quotas. 

I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly.

You might be interested in
Which describes how a person most likely laditude and logitude lines
kondor19780726 [428]

What are the options? I cannot tell you the answer unless I can see the options.

7 0
3 years ago
"No taxation without representation" was a statement against all of the following EXCEPT A) no representation in Parliament B) t
djverab [1.8K]
Hey!!

Answer: B)

Not A) bc it was about them having no representation
Not C) bc they saw the situation as an abuse of power by the king
Not D) bc taxation without representation is unfair taxation according to them.

Note: Them is the American colonists

3 0
3 years ago
This organization tries to keep friendly agreements between countries and sends in troops to keep
Marat540 [252]

Explanation:

im pretty sure the red cross

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why does the U.S have a constitution?<br> List and describe 4 amendments from the constitution.
son4ous [18]
1. freedom of speech, which means you can say whatever you want.
2. right to bear arms, which means you can carry
3. housing troops, you dont have to open your home to house soliders
5. plead the 5th, which means you dont have to say anything in court
4 0
3 years ago
What made the articles of confederation weak?
user100 [1]
It didn't give congress enough power or funding. They couldn't tax the state governments. 
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In Judaism, the demand for justice and moral righteousness was above what?
    6·1 answer
  • How did geography help shape the English colonies
    8·1 answer
  • The picture on the left shows a Roman building built nearly 2,000 years ago. The picture on the right shows an American building
    13·1 answer
  • How does the Supremacy Clause resolve a conflict between state law and national law?
    7·2 answers
  • Help please <br> i need 12 events that happened between 1100-1519<br> (Aztecs)
    12·1 answer
  • Judge or other officials
    7·1 answer
  • How did a Regan's Military buildup and policy Mikhail Gorbachev help contribute to the collapse of the Soviet Union?
    13·1 answer
  • Question 2 (2 points)
    7·2 answers
  • Many Asian cultures honor traditional religious and cultural practices. This is an example of
    14·1 answer
  • What invention changed the way<br> knights fought?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!