It would be to define the essay's purpose.
Answer:D. She runs more faster than her brother.
Explanation:
I wrote you in the details what are the examples that are missing in your question.
Because we are talking about illogical comparison, the correct answer it D.
It is the only sentence in examples that is grammatically incorrect so it doesn't make much logic. The word ''more'' is used wrongly and word ''faster'' is enough in this sentence because it is describing how is she running.
When we look back in the past of Chilean literature, Manuel Rojas, started his writing career in between the naturalist movement. To understand more, we can relate realism and naturalism. First, naturalists' writing involved an extreme portrayal of realism which focused more on barbaric attributes of the human race. And then, the characters included in such stories belonged to the bottom of the society, with an unsavory description.
We notice a non-participant narrator in this tale of kindness. He's a third-person narrator who is limited to the visuals and physical activities of the characters but has no access to their thoughts. However, he describes the mentality of the young boy. This effect is created to focus more on the conditions and their impact, on the miserable life.
Through this, it is easy to infer that the third choice would get you the best marks.
=> The use of third-person limited point of view allows the reader to better understand the main character.
<em><u>Answer:</u></em>
b) The comma attempts to join two independent clauses.
<em><u>Explanation:</u></em>
When two ideas come together and either one of them can stand by itself as its own, independent sentence, then the use of the comma is correct:
Comma + a conjunction (and, but, for, nor, yet, or, so)
