1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pavel [41]
2 years ago
8

The power to govern comes from the people

History
1 answer:
Oksana_A [137]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Popular sovereignty

Explanation:

"The power to govern comes from the people," is a principle of the popular sovereignty doctrine.

You might be interested in
Wanted to go beyond the ____ mountains
malfutka [58]

Answer:

tall ,sorry if its wrong

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In 1905, which country did Taft concede was under Japan's control, in exchange for recognition of U.S. possession of the Philipp
alina1380 [7]

Answer:The answer is Korea

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did patrick henry do?
AleksandrR [38]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

An outspoken Anti-Federalist, Henry opposed the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, which he felt put too much power in the hands of a national government. His influence helped create the Bill of Rights, which guaranteed personal freedoms and set limits on the government's power.

3 0
2 years ago
Which order lists government types from the least power for the people to the most?
EleoNora [17]

Answer:

21

Explanation:

10 +11 =21

7 0
2 years ago
Think about Miranda v. Arizona and how it related
Ludmilka [50]

The correct answers are The Fifth and Sixth Amendment

Explanation:

Miranda v. Arizona was a legal case in 1966, in this, Ernesto Miranda accused of kidnapping and sexual abuse confessed during the interrogation, which led to a sentence of about 20 years. However, Miranda was never told he could have counsel or guidance of a lawyer, he could remain in silence, or his words would be used against him, which means he was not informed of his rights and the legal procedure was not followed. Due to this, the Supreme Court determined the trial and process had not been legal and a retrial was necessary.

Moreover, this decision was related to the fifth amendment that protects against self-incrimination including the right to not answer questions against oneself; as well as, the sixth amendment that establishes a public, speedy and fair trial should be guaranteed. Thus, this case addressed the fifth and sixth amendments.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the two meanings of colorblindness ?
    9·1 answer
  • Why did the united states stay out of world war 1 at first?
    13·1 answer
  • How did the British defeat of the Spanish Armada pave the way for bristish colonies
    11·1 answer
  • Which describes the process of fracking? excavating Earth’s surface to reach veins of clean coal pumping toxic chemicals through
    12·2 answers
  • How is the American Revolution more than just a war about colonists wanting to break away from England?
    8·1 answer
  • What was wayne coyne beliefs
    5·1 answer
  • Hello humans how are ya'll doin, anyone wanna talk
    5·2 answers
  • What part of a ship is the prow
    15·1 answer
  • Question 1 of 20
    13·1 answer
  • How is terrorism different from other forms of warfare? Be sure to provide examples of economic, physical, political, or
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!