Answer:
-93
Step-by-step explanation:
This is just.a matter of using a couple of integration rules and plugging in then using order of operations.
Difference rule and constant multiple rule will be used here.
3(-17)-7(6)
-51-42
-93
Answer:
(a) 0.107 million per year
(b) 0.114 million per year
Step-by-step explanation:
(a) The average rate of change between 2000 and 2014 is determined by dividing the difference in the populations in the two years by the number of years. In the year 2000, 
and in 2014, 
. Mathematically,
(b) The instantaneous rate of change is determined by finding the differential derivative at that year.
The result of differentiating functions of the firm 
(where 
is a constant) is 
. Let's use in this in finding the derivative of 
.
In the year 2014, .
Answer:
3:16 3/16 3 to 16
Step-by-step explanation:
think the answer is a bruh!
This is a classic example of where you would need to use the process of elimination. Let's start with answer A, 3 classes.
If A were to be correct, 3 classes of 45 minutes each would be 132 greater than the amount he paid, 3 classes worth $12. We could easily express this as a math equation:
45 * 3 = 132 + (12 * 3) Then, all you would have to do is simplify:
135 = 132 + 36
135 = 168
Obviously this equation isn't true, and you can continue with answer choice B.
But wait... there's a better way. Using this starting equation, we can come up with a formula to solve for c, the number of classes. Let's take our starting equation:
45 * 3 = 132 + (12 * 3) Now, let's turn all the 3s into cs.
45c = 132 + 12c Then, using algebra, we can solve this equation.
-12c - 12c
33c = 132
33c/33 = 132/33
c = 4
And finally, we have our answer, B! I hope both methods help you in your further studies.
