During the 2008 presidential campaign, the two leading candidates for the Democratic nomination were "an African American man and a former first lady" The former being Obama and the latter being Clinton.
The American revolution inspired the idea that a country should secede and gain independence if they believe that the ruler of the country is a malevolent tyrant. The Civil War inspired hte idea that the country needs to remain unified even if the people don't agree and that we can always find a way to keep it together. They are opposite and at the time when they were created they suited the needs of the people.
One would be <span>Closely followed the policies of his precedessor and patron Andrew Jackson and was a key organizer of the Jacksonian Democratic Party</span>
Yes the allies showed they could reliably deliver food for the majority of the population and showed how dominant the allied Air Forces were while on the flip side they were causing food shortages on east Germany which the Russians believed could lead to an over throw of the government so I would say it was very successful
To offer medical assistance to Third World countries.
The imperialism movement of the 19th century did not show particular concern for the native peoples in the regions they came to control through imperialistic means. There were medical missions and religious missions that accompanied the imperialistic advance into other countries, but those were factors that accompanied the imperialistic advance more than they motivated it.
Also, as a false component of that option, the term "Third World" didn't come into existence until the era of the Cold War. The "Third World" referred to the developing nations that did not align with either of the superpowers, the USA or the USSR. No one was using the term "Third World" in the 19th century.
