by the government, hope this helped and hope I'm right
Answer:
ttgeheune ejen hen ehie bis heb ej ebheg7gghyv hhvukvf hugjo yugjgdyb thxh dtufd byyfrivc6ygxgy gthvcg fygfhyvvfybhwuv eheueyeh euusy usue7u haushbhahahh ysusin busueuveuu geunnieu hejyucyeb heheheu3ihb hejeb hahii haheu sjjsbbshhe hheihsbusb bishbrhsisjh ehdhdh shehf a keosb sheoebshb her hahvs bahwvk iyes hnwbjwn alwn wi oui haj bien merci
Explanation:
jehb jejehid jsje js ishebhsirbeirur ejbevruie rjrirbr hejr ri ehrvehe beirjbe ehejrr jeirn rbejebrhr behehhevve e rbehrhr r t t t t t yieirjjdje oui bien mersci
The actual corect choice isn't listed here because it's actually the peripheral nervous system,, but I suppose the correct answer for your given choices would be the central nervous system.
The peripheral nervous system refers to the parts of the nervous system that are outside the central nervous system, that is, those outside the brain and spinal cord.
<u>Answer: </u>
The "inter-parental conflict" perspective holds that conflict between parents is responsible for the lowered well-being of children of divorce.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Inter-parental conflict also termed as marital conflict and consists of parental disagreements, arguments and disputes.
The connection between inter-parental conflict (IPC) and behavioral or emotional abnormality or impairment in children is well established in both intact and divorced families.
Such phenomenon is responsible for the lowered well-being of children as witnessing anger or conflict can be strong dislike to children and also related with hiked arousal, distress and aggression also long-term adjustment challenges including emotional, social, behavioral and academic issues.
Therefore it is suggested that parents need to keep their children out of such conversations and rectify problems in most descent way possible because inter-parental conflict is terrible for whole family especially when it head towards divorce.
Answer:
Northerners viewed the violence against Senator Sumner as an attack on free speech.
Explanation:
The violence against Senator Charles Summer took place on May 22, 1856, during a disagreement between him and another senator regarding the maintenance of the slave system in the southern states of the USA. For Charles Summer, who was an abolitionist Republican, slavery was unacceptable in the United States and should be banned immediately. This raised the ire of southern politicians in favor of slavery, principally Deputy Preston Brooks, who was a Democrat in favor of slavery and in a moment of wrath, took a cane and beat Senator Summer.
The northern population was disgusted by this situation and saw this case as an illegal act of attack on freedom of expression. This helped to strengthen the enmity between northerners and southerners.
