Well you can graph it by plotting 3 points then drawing a line through these 3 points. The graph will be a straight line . By plotting 3 points you can be more sure if you are right, because if you make a mistake then they might not make a straight line.
Put y = 0 in the equation and find the x coordinate:-
x + 5(0) = -20
x = -20
So we have one point to plot:- (-20,0)
Putting x = 0 we get 5y = -20 so y = -4
Second point:- (0, -4)
Putting x = 5 say we get 4 + 5y = -20 so y = -25/5 = -5
so our 3rd point is (5, -5)
Yes is your answer. hope this helps!
Answer:
y-4 =-1(x+1) point slope form
y-2 = -1(x-1)
y = -x +3 slope intercept form
Step-by-step explanation:
We have 2 points, we can find the slope
m = (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)
= (2-4)/(1--1)
(2-4)/(1+1)
-2/2
=-1
The slope is -1
Then we can use point slope form to find an equation
y-y1 =m(x-x1)
y-4 = -1(x--1)
y-4 =-1(x+1) point slope form
Using the other point
y-2 = -1(x-1)
Distribute the -1
y-2 = -1x +1
Add 2 to each side
y-2+2 = -x+1+2
y = -x +3 slope intercept form
Answer:
yah if all your grades are A's and B's
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
No, because the 95% confidence interval contains the hypothesized value of zero.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello!
You have the information regarding two calcium supplements.
X₁: Calcium content of supplement 1
n₁= 12
X[bar]₁= 1000mg
S₁= 23 mg
X₂: Calcium content of supplement 2
n₂= 15
X[bar]₂= 1016mg
S₂= 24mg
It is known that X₁~N(μ₁; σ²₁), X₂~N(μ₂;δ²₂) and σ²₁=δ²₂=?
The claim is that both supplements have the same average calcium content:
H₀: μ₁ - μ₂ = 0
H₁: μ₁ - μ₂ ≠ 0
α: 0.05
The confidence level and significance level are to be complementary, so if 1 - α: 0.95 then α:0.05
since these are two independent samples from normal populations and the population variances are equal, you have to use a pooled variance t-test to construct the interval:
[(X[bar]₁-X[bar]₂) ± * ]
[(1000-1016)±2.060*23.57*]
[-34.80;2.80] mg
The 95% CI contains the value under the null hypothesis: "zero", so the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis. Then using a 5% significance level you can conclude that there is no difference between the average calcium content of supplements 1 and 2.
I hope it helps!