1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
krek1111 [17]
3 years ago
15

Why do you think that scientists discuss manned missions to Mars but not to Venus?

Geography
2 answers:
poizon [28]3 years ago
8 0

Explanation:

Well if you think about it...

Venus is to _____. (hot)

So they can't land on it.

Mars is _____. (Not nerarly as hot)

So they can land on it.

So missions to Mars is way safer.

Hope this helps! Sorry if it was not what you were looking for ...

Brums [2.3K]3 years ago
7 0
Because it would be easier to send humans on Mars because the conditions on mars are less extreme than on venus.
For example: temperatures on mars range between -125 degrees celcious to 35 degrees celcious while those on venus range between 450 degrees celcious to 475 degrees celcious
You might be interested in
Which of the following is the best description of the global grid?
Xelga [282]
D. An X-Y coordinate system, with the origin at 0° latitude and 0° longitude
3 0
3 years ago
What is a plateau and a plain
vladimir1956 [14]

A plateau is an area of relatively level high ground and a plain is a large area of flat land with few trees.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the name of the agreement that removes most tariffs between Mexico Canada and the United States
Kitty [74]

Answer:

The North American Free Trade Agreement :}

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If Earth's atmosphere did not contain greenhouse gasses and was only composed of Nitrogen and Oxygen, by how much would Earth's
Flauer [41]

Answer: 1- Option (D)

              2- Option (A)

Explanation:

The green house gases plays a significant role in the earth's global temperature. In absence of green house gas, the earth would have been very much cold and life would would be difficult to exist. The average global temperature would have been about -15°C to 25°C. So the most favorable answer given here is that the<u> earth's temperature would have decrease by about 60°C</u>.

<u>Carbon dioxide (CO₂) is not the most abundant green house gas</u>. It is the second most abundant. The present composition of CO₂ in the atmosphere is about 0.04% by volume. A small increase in the CO₂ level, can lead to a global rise in the temperature. Hence, <u>the above statement is false.</u>

6 0
3 years ago
What phrase best defines a galaxy
Setler [38]

Answer:

tightly packed group of older stars

large grouping of more than two stars

loose, disorganized star cluster held together by gravity

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why are guyana suriname and french guiana all separate countries
    9·1 answer
  • How is Brazil attempting to slow the effects of global warming? A. by cutting down rain forest trees B. by allowing Native Ameri
    12·1 answer
  • Discuss the view that the study of Geomorphology is interdisplinary in nature and scope
    15·1 answer
  • What are the borders that cross eachother
    14·1 answer
  • Why is the month of ramadan important to muslims?
    13·1 answer
  • What are the primary causes of poverty in Africa?
    14·2 answers
  • Defferentiate external and internal force ​
    6·1 answer
  • Explain how the supply of fuelwood is affected by human population growth
    7·1 answer
  • Approximately 90% of the Australian population lives where?
    7·2 answers
  • LACEMOPS helps use understand climate
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!