1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marizza181 [45]
3 years ago
5

True or false : Commoners were not allowed to travel or use the roads or they would be punished.​

History
1 answer:
Mariana [72]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

It is False

Explanation:

They would even be punished for running on the road.

You might be interested in
What are some possible results of expansion into the louisiana purchase
Alja [10]
Exploration <span>and settlement Border disputes Increased trade Problems with governance New.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compare and contrast the Aztec and Inca Empires. Explain at least three ways in which they were similar and three ways in which
dybincka [34]
Similarities:

Both empires emerged in the 14th and 15th centuries as postclassic civilizations building on the innovations of earlier political powers but expanding to greater extents

Both empires were entirely infantry, but well supplied, well-organized, and extremely aggressive and militaristic. Javelins, slings, spears and maces were used in battle.

Both empires had inherent instabilities

Both empires were fueled by corn.

Both empires have little to no seafaring, and instead stuck to the mountains and valleys in the center of the region.

Both empires conquered hundreds of cities in the region that resented their rule and taxation

Both empires were ended by Spanish invasions that capitalized on native divisions, introduced disease, and Spanish technology of guns, horses, and steel.

Both empires are misnamed-the Inka was the ruler of Tawantinsuyu, and the Aztecs adopted the name Mexica.

Both empires provided public education

Both Atahualpa and Moctezuma decided against confronting the Spanish militarily, allowing for the Spanish to take the Emperors hostage.

Attempts to restore the monarchy came after the capture and death of the emperor, but were too late.

Differences:

The Incas were bronze age, Aztecs were stone age

THe Incas assigned governors and shuffled conquered peoples around. There was a greater centralization than in Mexico

The Aztecs were a tributary empire, not a direct one.

The Aztecs had writing, while the Incas used Quipu

The Aztecs still had many rivals left unsubdued

The Inca used mostly potatoes while corn was far more dominant in Mexico.

The Inca had llamas, small but important livestock that made transport easier

The Inca had a sophisticated courier system of Chasquis along state-maintained roads

The Inca used bronze axes and halberds, with slings and maces as their main weapons alongside spears. The Aztecs used obsidian swords and glaives instead for close combat, and used javelins far more. Likewise, while Inca military relied on the unit’s experience and officer corps for their quality like the Romans, the Aztecs instead had a feudalistic division between the elite knights and commoners, with advancement by taking captives.

The Inca allowed women into their schools but not commoners. The Aztecs prohibited women but allowed for peasant men to also gain an education.

The diseases that destroyed the Incas came before the Spanish actually arrived in Peru, while the Spanish had been in Mexico for months before the plagues killed the emperor and populace.

Moctezuma’s mistake was trying to use generosity to awe the Spanish and try to coax them on his side, while Atahualpa’s was trying to awe them with his army rather than actually using it.

The Inca political crisis was a civil war between two brothers, while the Aztec’s was a three way duel between the King, the Priests, and the Aristocracy and military.
5 0
2 years ago
What world look like without religion?
astraxan [27]

all deemonic killers



hope this helps

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Someone help(reporting for stupid answers)
kicyunya [14]

Answer:

stupid answer

Explanation:

the answer is a i took the quiz

6 0
3 years ago
What happened in Afghanistan after the taliban fell?
lyudmila [28]

The United States invasion of Afghanistan occurred after the September 11 attacks in late 2001 and was supported by close US allies. ... Its public aims were to dismantle al-Qaeda and deny it a safe base of operations in Afghanistan by removing the Taliban from power.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The term for a member of the House of Representatives is ______ years and he or she must be ______ years of age.
    13·1 answer
  • What does the map above illustrate?
    14·2 answers
  • Question 1- How do you think the sneak attack by the Japanese at pearl harbor, which killed nearly 3,000 Americans, impact the g
    6·1 answer
  • If you know any of these can you help me out, it’s about the Berlin Conference
    7·1 answer
  • Which statement describes the argument that Equiano is making in this passage?
    13·1 answer
  • The battle of Trenton was an important battle for the Americans because _____________. A)their victory raised morale among the c
    15·2 answers
  • The attacks of September 11th, 2001, were preceded by attacks in 1998 on American embassies in Tanzania and. . .
    7·2 answers
  • HELP this is due at 11:59
    7·1 answer
  • From where did nationalist leadership emerge?​
    9·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP I WILL MARK BRAINLIEST
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!